What do you think about the log4j bits?
--jason
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> I just updated it, the reason is because we need to clearly say what is
> booted, it is really JBoss with the microkernel that is booted with the
> first services.
>
> I now say JBoss (MX microkernel) :)
I just updated it, the reason is because we need to clearly say what is
booted, it is really JBoss with the microkernel that is booted with the
first services.
I now say JBoss (MX microkernel) :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ok, fine by me.
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java
> Again legacy...
>
> 2.odd 2.even s
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java
|
|
|Can't say that I care either way but that is the convention that has been
|in use.
|
|> What's the purpose of the "FINAL" designation? I assume that it
|means that
|> this
Can't say that I care either way but that is the convention that has been
in use.
> What's the purpose of the "FINAL" designation? I assume that it means that
> this is a stable, tested release, but the word "final" doesn't make sense
> to me. Perhaps it's just me, though.
>
> Toby.
>
__
It is legacy at this point.
We used to run 2.0 BETA and then move to 2.0 FINAL.
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Toby
|Allsopp
|Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:11 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:29:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> User: starksm
> Date: 01/04/11 19:29:33
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss Tag: Branch_2_2 Main.java
> Log:
> Update the version string to "2.2.1 FINAL" in prepration for the release.
What's the purpose of the "FINA
