RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
Ok, I have made the jbossretro.jar a java5 only artifact and I am tagging this as the 1.0.0.GA release as there has been no problem feedback. > -Original Message- > From: Adrian Brock > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 7:08 AM > To: Scott M Stark > Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Adrian Brock; > Dimitris Andreadis; Ryan Campbell > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 08:57 -0500, Scott M Stark wrote: > > Why insn't the jbossretro.jar only including java5 classes while > > jbossretro-rt.jar the jdk14 classes? > > No idea? This was a change you made. :-) > http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/JBoss?cs=MAIN:starksm:20060 > 103185159 > > Before that, the whole lot was weaved to JDK1.4 > -- > > Adrian Brock > Chief Scientist > JBoss Inc. > > > --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 08:57 -0500, Scott M Stark wrote: > Why insn't the jbossretro.jar only including java5 classes while > jbossretro-rt.jar the jdk14 classes? No idea? This was a change you made. :-) http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/JBoss?cs=MAIN:starksm:20060103185159 Before that, the whole lot was weaved to JDK1.4 -- Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
It's the retro of the classes themselves and duplicate inclusion of these in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] jbossretro]$ ls output/classes/org/jboss/lang/ Annotation.class*EnumImpl.class*javassist/ AnnotationHelper.class* ExceptionHelper.class* reflect/ Autoboxing.class*Iterable.class* ClassRedirects.class*JBossStringBuilder.class* [EMAIL PROTECTED] jbossretro]$ ls output/classes14/org/jboss/lang/ Annotation.class*EnumImpl.class*javassist/ AnnotationHelper.class* ExceptionHelper.class* reflect/ Autoboxing.class*Iterable.class* ClassRedirects.class*JBossStringBuilder.class* Why insn't the jbossretro.jar only including java5 classes while jbossretro-rt.jar the jdk14 classes? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott M Stark > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:45 AM > To: Adrian Brock; Dimitris Andreadis > Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Ryan Campbell > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > The org.jboss.lang.Enum class does not appear to have been > removed, and there is something wrong with the build that is > adding classes twice. > I'll look into it. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adrian Brock > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:19 AM > > To: Dimitris Andreadis > > Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Scott M Stark; Ryan > > Campbell; Adrian Brock > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > > > This jar needs rebuilding from scratch. It is a mess, with > the classes > > in the jar twice? > > > > jar -tf > > ~/jboss-4.0/thirdparty/jboss/jbossretro/lib/jbossretro.jar > | grep Enum > > org/jboss/lang/Enum.class org/jboss/lang/EnumImpl.class > > org/jboss/util/EnumMap.class org/jboss/util/EnumSet.class > > org/jboss/lang/Enum.class org/jboss/lang/EnumImpl.class > > org/jboss/util/EnumMap.class org/jboss/util/EnumSet.class > > > > The org/jboss/lang/Enum doesn't exist anymore (except in aop). > > > > On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 07:35 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > > > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, > but I do see > > > the old org.jboss.lang.Enum there, and in the > > jbossretro-rt.jar that > > > goes with JBAS 4.0.4. > > > > > > Is this why the org.jboss.test.compatibility.test still fails? > > > > > > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3103 > > > > > > > > > http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-4.0-testsuite/200605 > > > 03 > > > > > > 051758/results/org/jboss/test/compatibility/test/SerialVersionUIDUnitT > > > es > > > tCase.html > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > > > Scott M Stark > > > > Sent: 30 March, 2006 01:28 > > > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro > > org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > > > > > > > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, > > and I moved > > > > the > > > > JBossRetro_1_0_0_CR1 tag on the updated files so can you > > rebuild the > > > > current 1.0.0.CR1 jars. > > > --- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web > services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make > your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on > Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 > ___ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
The org.jboss.lang.Enum class does not appear to have been removed, and there is something wrong with the build that is adding classes twice. I'll look into it. > -Original Message- > From: Adrian Brock > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:19 AM > To: Dimitris Andreadis > Cc: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Scott M Stark; > Ryan Campbell; Adrian Brock > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > This jar needs rebuilding from scratch. It is a mess, with > the classes in the jar twice? > > jar -tf > ~/jboss-4.0/thirdparty/jboss/jbossretro/lib/jbossretro.jar | > grep Enum org/jboss/lang/Enum.class > org/jboss/lang/EnumImpl.class org/jboss/util/EnumMap.class > org/jboss/util/EnumSet.class org/jboss/lang/Enum.class > org/jboss/lang/EnumImpl.class org/jboss/util/EnumMap.class > org/jboss/util/EnumSet.class > > The org/jboss/lang/Enum doesn't exist anymore (except in aop). > > On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 07:35 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, but I do see > > the old org.jboss.lang.Enum there, and in the > jbossretro-rt.jar that > > goes with JBAS 4.0.4. > > > > Is this why the org.jboss.test.compatibility.test still fails? > > > > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3103 > > > > > http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-4.0-testsuite/200605 > > 03 > > > 051758/results/org/jboss/test/compatibility/test/SerialVersionUIDUnitT > > es > > tCase.html > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > > > Scott M Stark > > > Sent: 30 March, 2006 01:28 > > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro > org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > > > > > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, > and I moved > > > the > > > JBossRetro_1_0_0_CR1 tag on the updated files so can you > rebuild the > > > current 1.0.0.CR1 jars. --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
This jar needs rebuilding from scratch. It is a mess, with the classes in the jar twice? jar -tf ~/jboss-4.0/thirdparty/jboss/jbossretro/lib/jbossretro.jar | grep Enum org/jboss/lang/Enum.class org/jboss/lang/EnumImpl.class org/jboss/util/EnumMap.class org/jboss/util/EnumSet.class org/jboss/lang/Enum.class org/jboss/lang/EnumImpl.class org/jboss/util/EnumMap.class org/jboss/util/EnumSet.class The org/jboss/lang/Enum doesn't exist anymore (except in aop). On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 07:35 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, but I do see the > old org.jboss.lang.Enum there, and in the jbossretro-rt.jar that goes > with JBAS 4.0.4. > > Is this why the org.jboss.test.compatibility.test still fails? > > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3103 > > http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-4.0-testsuite/20060503 > 051758/results/org/jboss/test/compatibility/test/SerialVersionUIDUnitTes > tCase.html > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Scott M Stark > > Sent: 30 March, 2006 01:28 > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > > > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, and I moved the > > JBossRetro_1_0_0_CR1 tag on the updated files so can you > > rebuild the current 1.0.0.CR1 jars. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > Ryan Campbell > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:13 PM > > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > > > > > >> A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created > > > > > > Hopefully one that fixes > > > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683 so that the > > remaining 4.0.4 > > > webservice testsuite failures are resolved. > > > > > > --- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > > scripting language > > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend > > the live webcast > > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new > > coding territory! > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > > ___ > > JBoss-Development mailing list > > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > -- Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, but I do see the old org.jboss.lang.Enum there, and in the jbossretro-rt.jar that goes with JBAS 4.0.4. Is this why the org.jboss.test.compatibility.test still fails? http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3103 http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-4.0-testsuite/20060503 051758/results/org/jboss/test/compatibility/test/SerialVersionUIDUnitTes tCase.html > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott M Stark > Sent: 30 March, 2006 01:28 > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, and I moved the > JBossRetro_1_0_0_CR1 tag on the updated files so can you > rebuild the current 1.0.0.CR1 jars. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Ryan Campbell > > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:13 PM > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > > > >> A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created > > > > Hopefully one that fixes > > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683 so that the > remaining 4.0.4 > > webservice testsuite failures are resolved. > > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend > the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new > coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > ___ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
This is done. Thomas can make build the jbossws14 release now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:28 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, and I moved the JBossRetro_1_0_0_CR1 tag on the updated files so can you rebuild the current 1.0.0.CR1 jars. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ryan Campbell > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:13 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > >> A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created > > Hopefully one that fixes > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683 so that the > remaining 4.0.4 webservice testsuite failures are resolved. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
The class has been renamed to org.jboss.lang.EnumImpl, and I moved the JBossRetro_1_0_0_CR1 tag on the updated files so can you rebuild the current 1.0.0.CR1 jars. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ryan Campbell > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:13 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > >> A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created > > Hopefully one that fixes > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683 so that the > remaining 4.0.4 webservice testsuite failures are resolved. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
>> A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created Hopefully one that fixes http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683 so that the remaining 4.0.4 webservice testsuite failures are resolved. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 3:58 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict Ok. A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created from the updated jbossretro jars. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Adrian Brock > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:43 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > Ideally we want a way for aop and jbosretro to use the same > implementations. The same thing applies to the > ScopedClassPool vs AOPClassPool/JBossClassPool and the annotations. > > For now, I'd suggest just renaming the JBossRetro class until > somebody has time to look at it. > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
Ok. A new jbossws14 binary will need to be created from the updated jbossretro jars. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Adrian Brock > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:43 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict > > Ideally we want a way for aop and jbosretro to use the same > implementations. The same thing applies to the > ScopedClassPool vs AOPClassPool/JBossClassPool and the annotations. > > For now, I'd suggest just renaming the JBossRetro class until > somebody has time to look at it. > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] aop/jbossretro org.jboss.lang.Enum conflict
Ideally we want a way for aop and jbosretro to use the same implementations. The same thing applies to the ScopedClassPool vs AOPClassPool/JBossClassPool and the annotations. For now, I'd suggest just renaming the JBossRetro class until somebody has time to look at it. On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 14:54 -0600, Scott M Stark wrote: > There is a conflict between two org.jboss.lang.Enum objects, one from > aop and another from jbossretro. There should only be one. The > jbosstretro version is more complete, but is not designed to be usable > in js2e1.4 without being translated. > > How are we going to resolve this? > > > Scott Stark > VP Architecture & Technology > JBoss Inc. > > > > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > ___ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
