Well done tom :)

marcf 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Tom Elrod
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] commit of jmx package done
> 
> (I sent this last night be never showed up in my inbox, so 
> sending it again.  Sorry if you get this twice, but wanted to 
> make sure it got out)
> 
> The commit of jmx package to HEAD to bring in JMX 1.2 from
> BRANCH_4_0_DR3 is done.  I tagged CVS with 'pre_JMX_1_2' 
> immediately before commit and tagged with 'pre_JMX_DR3' a few 
> days ago, which is the source the committed code was based 
> on.  I tagged with 'post_JMX_DR3'
> after all the files were committed.  It looks like everything 
> is building properly in Linux and Windows as well as starting 
> the server with 'all' configuration is working (both Linux 
> and Windows).
> 
> I have not committed the changes for the testsuite, so it is 
> not compiling at this point.  I will be committing those 
> files tomorrow, accompanied by another CVS tag.  However, I 
> ran the testsuite before initial commit (which will should be 
> same results after commit) and can see the results of HEAD 
> and the changed code at following links:
> 
> before:
> http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/windows/
> HEAD/html/
> 
> after:
> http://e2technologies.net/projects/jboss/test/results/windows/
> rollback/html/
> 
> If you experience any problems you think are related to the 
> checkin, please let me know.
> 
> The rest of this covers the changes made...
> 
> The code checked in under the jmx package was all based on the
> BRANCH_4_0_DR3 and had to remove some of the files at HEAD, 
> add some files to HEAD, and modify a lot of existing files.  
> The only package to remain untouched was the mx.loading.  The 
> packages for JMX Remoting were removed and will be added back 
> as it's own module (in order to break the dependency between 
> jboss-mx and jboss-remoting).
> 
> Also, if you have checked any code into the jmx module within 
> the past couple of weeks, I can not guarantee that I did not 
> over write the changes with my local updated copy.  I tried 
> to find any changes that I could migrate into the jmx 1.2 
> codebase, but is very possible I missed something. So I you 
> have made changes to jmx, please help me by verifying that 
> you changes made it into this commit (or are at least 
> relevant to the new code base).
> 
> Files to committed outside of jmx package:
> 
> sever\src\main\org\jboss\jmx\connector\rmi\RMIConnectorImpl.java
> server\src\main\org\jboss\web\ WebClassLoader.java 
> jboss.net\src\main\org\jboss\net\jmx\adaptor\server\Adaptor.java
> system\src\main\org\jboss\Main.java
> server\src\main\org\jboss\jmx\adaptor\rmi\RMIAdaptor.java
> tomcat\build.xml
> build\build.xml
> 
> Had to hack in some changes to LoaderRepository.  The reason 
> is that WebClassLoader now indirectly uses this, which calls 
> getCachedClass() at some point (per changes to HEAD at start 
> of the month).  So I copied the implementation from 
> UnifiedLoaderRepository3 to make it work.  However, this is 
> NOT a good long term solution as LoaderRepository is an 
> abstract class and the extending classes will need to be able 
> to get access to the cache so it can clear it if a 
> ClassLoader is removed.  Adrian, could use your help on 
> straightening this out.
> 
> -Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source 
> Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new features 
> and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-Development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to