PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Elrod
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss remoting callbacks [was JB4DR1 Deadline
MAY 26]
Guess Jeff beat me to it ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nathan Phelps
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss remoting callbacks [was JB4DR1 Deadline
MAY 26]
I question if A JMSServerInvocationHandler is even necessary (along with
the JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nathan Phelps
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss remoting callbacks [was JB4DR1 Deadline
MAY 26]
I question if A JMSServerInvocationHandler
Jeff made the fix last night and I have not looked at the code yet (he still
has it local while we are testing that and some other fixes out). However,
my understanding from Jeff is that the invoker client passes its locator to
the invoker server if it wishes to receive callbacks. The invoker
Guess Jeff beat me to it ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom
Elrod
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss remoting callbacks [was JB4DR1 Deadline
MAY 26
I'm not sure if it so much of an issue since only DP classes
will be downloaded.
clearly.
ALSO PLEASE LETS PUT SOME DOCUMENTATION IN PLACE. Beginner and
advanced, we need to streamline this as communicating on the development
is the key, thanks for doing this bill.
Again the new website
I'm working on this ... Should have something sometime soon.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss remoting
I'm not sure if it so much
Yes, the class downloading is inefficient and has some large room for
improvement. However, to be noted, that it will only download classes
from the remote side if the class doesn't exists locally (or at least
isn't visible). This is a little more efficient, as I remember, than
RMI where the
I'm not sure if it so much of an issue since only DP classes will be
downloaded.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff
Haynie
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss remoting
Yes
Woo hoo!! Thanks! This looks great!!!
Will you guys mind if I fix minor oversights I notice (such as making
handler names consistently upper case in ServerInvoker)?
Partly so I don't forget and partly to think out loud as I read the code,
here are my initial comments:
1. There's kind of an
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
David Jencks
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Remoting Commit
Woo hoo!! Thanks! This looks great!!!
Will you guys mind if I fix minor oversights I notice (such as making
handler names
11 matches
Mail list logo
