RE: [JBoss-dev] jmx remoting + copyright in a jbossmx file
Yes, this is my fault and will resolve. My IDE automatically puts those at the top of every new class and I have to remember to delete them and replace for JBOSS code. This code is part of JBOSS and not part of Vocalocity. I will remove ASAP. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anatoly Akkerman Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 5:57 PM To: JBoss-Dev Subject: [JBoss-dev] jmx remoting + copyright in a jbossmx file Hi, I've been browsing the HEAD in CVS to find out what the status of JMX remoting is. It appears that significant pieces have been implemented. I was hoping to use some of this stuff decoupled from JBoss itself, is it usable already? (I understand that classloading is a work in progress, can this work if all classes are available in both MBean servers?) And another thing I've noticed in one of the files, you might want to fix it. This is from org/jboss/mx/remote/connector/socket/SocketExecutor.java /** * @(#)$Id: SocketExecutor.java,v 1.3 2003/01/02 02:34:45 jhaynie Exp $ * * This code is PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL to Vocalocity, Inc. * -- DO NOT RE-DISTRIBUTE THIS SOURCE CODE WITHOUT EXPRESS PERMISSION. -- * * This source code is Copyright (c) 2001-2002 by Vocalocity, Inc. * All Rights Reserved. * * The source code for this program is not published or * otherwise divested of its trade secrets, irrespective * of what has been deposited with the US Copyright Office. * */ Anatoly. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] jmx remoting + copyright in a jbossmx file
JMX remoting (as it stands now) is in pretty decent shape. By this I mean the main features have been implemented (detectors, connectors, classloading, etc.). However, it has not been strenuously tested in the field yet. Also, much of what is there now will probably change to use the more generic invoker framework in the near future. The same functionality will still be there, but much of the remoting code will be moved into the invoker framework code. To be specific about your classloader question, the current code will ignore classloading feature if can find class locally. Will remotely load the class if can not find locally. All this is working now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anatoly Akkerman Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 5:57 PM To: JBoss-Dev Subject: [JBoss-dev] jmx remoting + copyright in a jbossmx file Hi, I've been browsing the HEAD in CVS to find out what the status of JMX remoting is. It appears that significant pieces have been implemented. I was hoping to use some of this stuff decoupled from JBoss itself, is it usable already? (I understand that classloading is a work in progress, can this work if all classes are available in both MBean servers?) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
