[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-709559 ] Bogus http session handling(?)

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=709559group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-709559 ] Bogus http session handling(?)

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=709559group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-709559 ] Bogus http session handling(?)

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=709559group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-26 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, Yep - tried with and without... but you'd think it would be consistent if that was the problem - ant would either have enough memory or not... Thanks, Chris --- Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried the equivalent of this sort of thing in your script? [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-710007 ] WEBDAV deployment

2003-03-26 Thread Sacha Labourey
I guess this is a question for Jeremy Boynes. Nevertheless, I think to remember that being able to have this would also mean fixing some classloading behaviour in Jasper. Cheers, Sacha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-710007 ] WEBDAV deployment

2003-03-26 Thread Jeremy Boynes
I just posted a reply in the tracker, and bounced him to you for RussianDoll issues - tag :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sacha Labourey Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [

[JBoss-dev] Eclipse does not read $CVSROOT/cvsignore

2003-03-26 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Hi, .cvsignore file were recently removed from HEAD and replaced with global $CVSROOT/cvsignore file. Unfortunately, Eclipse does not read $CVSROOT/cvsignore and shows all project/output directories as outgoing changes. Will anybody mind if I put .cvsignore files back? Igor Fedorenko Think

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710149 ] Patch request for DestinationManager class

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710149, was opened at 2003-03-26 16:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710149group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP

2003-03-26 Thread Igor Fedorenko
You have read/write correct? I guess that was exactly what I wanted to know ;-) Javassist may not be creating the correct throws clauses. Can you add a test for this under the testsuite and under aop/? I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing. Done. Added

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710204 ] ra.xml does not pass validation

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 10:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710204group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-707730 ] No error returned while getting Queue factory.

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #707730, was opened at 2003-03-21 20:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=707730group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Hobot (hobot) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710396 ] Deployed .war unaccessible in Tomcat 4.1

2003-03-26 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Assigned to: Scott M

[JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Bill Burke
I have implemented a new AOP service for Serializable POJOs, Versioned Objects. You can transactionally version an object. If you modify the object within a transaction, this modification is not seen by other transactions. If the tx commits, the changes seen, if a rollback happens the changes

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread marc fleury
I just want to give credit to Julien Viet as well who pitched that idea when he was in ATL, kudos Bill, you are in orbit, the pings in your head, the code in CVS, let them fight, let's move marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread marc fleury
second revolution, I just can't say how excited I am. We are doing magic, critical mass. Julien goes I got a silly idea.. bill makes it real, there is war.. we are doing RAW stuff, and rarely was I that excited about it all... you ain't seen nothing yet wankers PLgC marcf

[JBoss-dev] Verify primary key implements equals and hashCode

2003-03-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements (you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes inherited methods, so we can use it to verify if a primary key has actually implemented hashCode and equals.

Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Dave Smith
Too bad that the whole world is more intretsed whether or not JBOSS will become J2EE certified. I was reading an article about Unintended Consequences that made me think of the current J2EE cerification vs. JBOSS 4.0 with AOP. In 1349 the black plague was spreading around Europe. In castles

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread marc fleury
So in the quest to impove J2EE have you killed it? bla bla bla bla marc fleury wrote: do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is? obviously some of you don't get it, give it time, it will become very obvious enough wasted time in the U.N. Time for some good ol' action marcf

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread marc fleury
The story about the flees was pretty good though, but kind of irrelevant :) marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned

Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Dave Smith
:rotfl .. a Frenchman wanting action This is hot shit. Plain and simple. Take the J2EE spec and piss all over it. When you wrote it your mind was small and feeble, we have seen the light. The question is how long before the world realizes it or does J2EE implode and we all are paying

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Ben Sabrin
Dave, Think about this. If we wait for the spec to implement the kind of stuff dot net is doing, J2EE is dead anyhow. At 10K per CPU J2EE is dead as well. We are moving to a commodity based infrastructure, dot net can play so can open source and IBM. Not sure too many others can join the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Verify primary key implements equals and hashCode

2003-03-26 Thread Victor Langelo
Dain Sundstrom wrote: After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements (you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes inherited methods, so we can use it to verify if a primary key has actually implemented

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Smith Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration Too bad that the whole world is more intretsed whether or

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Jeff Haynie
Bill, This is fabulous stuff. Good job. Is there a way we might be able to use the AOP xml to dynamically do your example below (as well as the clustered and remoting) for POJOs during construction time? In other words, could you not have an interceptor on a constructor pointcut that would do

Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Pope Paul V ordered Bellarmine to have the Sacred Congregation of the Index decide on the Copernican theory. The cardinals of the Inquisition met on 24 February 1616 and took evidence from theological experts. They condemned the teachings of Copernicus, and Bellarmine conveyed their decision to

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration Pope Paul V ordered Bellarmine to have the Sacred

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration Bill, This is fabulous stuff. Good job. JBoss Remoting

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Jeff Haynie
JBoss Remoting is much more fabulous. We need to get the word out on it... I need to write some darn docs.. Too busy trying to get a new release out on our side. Not enough hours in a day. I totally agree. And yes, a constructor pointcut is the way to go. The only downside of constructor

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration JBoss Remoting is much more fabulous. We need to get the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Verify primary key implements equals and hashCode

2003-03-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 09:29 PM, Victor Langelo wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements (you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes inherited methods, so

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Karthik
Hi bill, The versioning of POJO is very good. I have some issues here. If I version a object, then I have to maintain all the state in the same POJO which is not the general case and will bloat the code. The states are maintained in the helper classes. Also defining each POJO as versioned is

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Karthik
Versioning -- Versioning can be done by Byte code manipulation. Instead of maintaining the state as a proxy, you can maintain the state in a list in the manipulated class. Remoting -- has to be done through proxy, but abstract the user by the Inteceptor sending the proxy based on the

Re: [JBoss-dev] run scripts and -server

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Reich
Just a word of caution: the SUN server vm had a lot of stability issues in the past, which was one of the reasons for BEA to use JRockit. I stopped using the server vm because of frequent crashes under load as well; this might have been fixed, however. The -server setting has high thresholds