IMPRESSIVE BILL! Congratulations! Not only does this is impressive, but it
is ridiculously EASY to use.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: jeudi, 27. mars 2003 01:09
To: Jboss-Dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned
Feature Requests item #710621, was opened at 2003-03-27 12:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=710621group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Igor A. Karpov (ikar)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #638994, was opened at 2002-11-15 17:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=638994group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Ogura (jogura)
Assigned
Bugs item #710655, was opened at 2003-03-27 13:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710655group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Igor A. Karpov (ikar)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Hi,
I trying to do an automated/regular compile/test on windows - but the
build script has a pause command at the end.
Since I run the clean and then build and then test... this is a bit
problematic...
I plan to make it optional - the default will be that it pauses - but
if you set an env var,
Hello,
I'm looking for correct algorithm, that merges states of some clustered
service when parition merge occurs.
Consider following scenario:
1. Running 8 node cluster
2. Added key name with value=beforesplit into state (state is
replicated across all nodes of cluster)
3. Because of network
Bugs item #594137, was opened at 2002-08-12 19:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594137group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
You can subscribe to merge events if you want to implement the merging
yourself i.e. if you use the clustering framework for your own mbeans.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Klimek
Sent: jeudi, 27. mars 2003 12:36
To: [EMAIL
hi dain,
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 02:37, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Who maintains the verifier?
i do. shall i integrate yours/victors proposal?
best regards,
christian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and
Bugs item #576913, was opened at 2002-07-03 07:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=576913group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned
Bugs item #710755, was opened at 2003-03-27 14:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710755group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tarek Hammoud (thammoud)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #710758, was opened at 2003-03-27 14:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710758group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tarek Hammoud (thammoud)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 18:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710204group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming)
Assigned to: David Jencks
Bugs item #710757, was opened at 2003-03-27 14:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710757group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tarek Hammoud (thammoud)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #682352, was opened at 2003-02-07 14:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=682352group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to: David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Karthik
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
Hi bill,
The versioning of POJO is very good. I have some
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 09:29 PM, Victor Langelo wrote:
I haven't read Effective Java, but this won't work for us. We
intentionally create derived primary key classes for each entity.
These are derived from generic pk classes when the primary key data
is a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Karthik
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
Versioning --
Versioning can be done by Byte code
when I thought about this, I was trying avoir the current construct :
B oldB = a.getB();
C oldC = a.getC();
try
{
a.setB(b);
a.setC(c);
}
catch(Throwable t)
{
a.setB(oldB);
a.setC(oldc);
}
and I was trying to find a way to make atomic Deployment within
deployers. Deploy all or
Bill,
If you use versioning on a POJO that is a the top of
an object graph, will the children objects also be
versions when they are modified???
I assume No. But I think it would make sense for your
Versioning interceptor to wrap up children objets with
the versioning proxy also when they are
I'm not sure...The problem with Versioning and Remoting is that a proxy
object is required. You have to return a different object than the one
actually constructed.
You getting me? I'm not sure if this can be done within bytecode
manipulation. I'll have to ask the Javassist guys.
Why?
hey hey, let's take it online new site is up with NUKES and it rocks,
you can see who is on and stuff
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of julien viet
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Bill Burke
Subject: Re[2]:
Please would it possible to have JBoss site stabilised? As it is
now you never know what it will be like next time surfing there and
forum messages that i sent yesterday is now suddenly gone and other
threads reports to be updated but they arent And are there really
620 guests
is online, julien delivered and the stuff is running.
it is stable and fast. Our machine is sitting at 2% utilization with
cached permissions and stuff. Nukes on JBoss is real and will be a
fantastic project
marcf
xx
Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
President, Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
Sacha Labourey wrote:
You can subscribe to merge events if you want to implement the merging
yourself i.e. if you use the clustering framework for your own mbeans.
Hi, thank's for answering. Yes I'm using clustering framwork and
membershipChangedDuringMerge, but I didn't find any correct
Bugs item #710755, was opened at 2003-03-27 14:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710755group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tarek Hammoud (thammoud)
Assigned to:
Oh, in that case... forget my last post - Looking forward to a fast and
stable and not-always-changing site :)
by the way... at the moment it is not answering ;)
/L
torsdagen den 27 mars 2003 kl 16.30 skrev marc fleury:
is online, julien delivered and the stuff is running.
it is stable and
Changing the concurrent number of thread allowed for JBossWeb: 100 was way
to small!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lennart Petersson
Sent: jeudi, 27. mars 2003 16:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] NUKES on JBoss
Bugs item #710806, was opened at 2003-03-27 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710806group_id=22866
Category: Nukes
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Matthew Munz (mattmunz)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Hi, thank's for answering. Yes I'm using clustering framwork and
membershipChangedDuringMerge, but I didn't find any correct
alghorithm
how to choose value for conflicting keys. (e.g. Timestamping)
I hoped that I would find this idea in source code for
DistributedStateService but as I
Yes, its a deep copy which is why I require Serializable.
new MarshalledObject(obj).get();
Maybe there is a better way to make copies?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL
Points taken on the website.
Do you prefer the look though? we are trying the more pro approach. I
think it sucks but ben my sales guy is all excited about it... what do
you think? we just released NUKES, the forums were switched and yes we
lost a couple of hours of posts. Apologies and thanks
It's not the new look that is bad (the red bar and the menu) its all the
other stuff that blinks worse than your average porn site. An eyesore. Too
much stuff that just bounces around.
Looks is good, should continue to apply it to the rest of the stuff.
Layout is bad, needs a complete redesign
On Thursday, Mar 27, 2003, at 03:28 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury wrote:
So in the quest to impove J2EE have you killed it?
bla bla bla bla
marc fleury wrote:
do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is?
obviously some of you don't get it, give it time, it will become very
obvious
It would be
Marc,
the new site is nice
Do you prefer the look though? we are trying the more pro
The page width is too big. It needs horizontal scrolling even on
1024x768. I think it should be limited to somewhat around 750 pixels
in width (or let the middle content collapse/expand in width depending
on
you are saying get rid of the ads?
that is not going to be possible right now :)
if it is something more precise let me know
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juha-P Lindfors
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:24 AM
To:
Little bug:
- go to User registration/login
- press Retrieve lost password
result:
Module NS-LostPassword has not been found
Regards,
Stephan
On IE6.0 on W2K, the drop downs on the front page, such as
Forums...Development, doesn't do anything. However, if I click on
Forums... It goes to the main forums page.
Also, when I try and login, I get a Logging you in, hang tight! and
the page never returns The IE globe spins to infinity
I'm afraid that this problem is unsolvable and there allways be
situations in cluster, that after partition merge, cluster will be in
inconsistent state and would produce wrong output.
No. Cases:
- DRM: we refresh total view after merging
Agree.
- Http session: sticky sessions = the last
Marc,
if it is something more precise let me know
Replace the top left jboss flash-image with a gif/png/... one.
Not everyone has flash enabled.
Heiko
--
Bancotec GmbH EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calwer Str. 33 Telefon: +49 711 222 992 900
D-70173 Stuttgart Telefax: +49 711 222 992
no I am saying rethink how you lay them out -- having them appear all over
the place (top, bottom, several on both sides) like they are now doesn't
look very good.
its a layout issue, it sucks
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, marc fleury wrote:
you are saying get rid of the ads?
that is not going to
OK fine, be specific on where you would put them,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juha-P Lindfors
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site
no I am
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Jeff Haynie wrote:
Also, when I try and login, I get a Logging you in, hang tight! and
the page never returns The IE globe spins to infinity
works for me, when the site is actually responding (IE6 + W2K)
however, the remember me thingy doesnt work, probably something
How is this not the general case? All application code
accesses the POJO
through the proxy. I am going to write a
constructor-pointcut that will
always return a proxy instead of the real POJO on construction.
Here I mean to say if only deep copy is not made.
The performance hit
move main menu on left side to top because now it is in different place
everytime depending what ad is on top of it, try to keep all pics on the
same side of the page (docu, faces, ad), get rid of the ad box at the
bottom of every page and cycle them on the top bar
-- Juha
On Thu, 27 Mar
We've been trying hard to keep the development forums as the base of design
discussions. There's a lot of good information there.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stefan Arentz
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL
convert the main page text box titles to use same style as in menu and
side bars.
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, marc fleury wrote:
OK fine, be specific on where you would put them,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juha-P
After looking at the javassist docs
last night is something like using casting to dynamically add
interceptors. This might be bad, haven't thought through all the
implications ... But, imagine:
Where is it. I cant find any documents regarding casting and I feel that is
impossible
marc fleury wrote:
is online, julien delivered and the stuff is running.
it is stable and fast. Our machine is sitting at 2% utilization with
cached permissions and stuff. Nukes on JBoss is real and will be a
fantastic project
It is _very_slow_ and does not work at all. The only thing I can
Bugs item #682352, was opened at 2003-02-07 14:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=682352group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to: David
Bugs item #710921, was opened at 2003-03-27 13:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710921group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sean hager (seanhager)
Assigned to:
That might be a problem if you have a big object
graph. You get a big penalty even if you only modify
a small peice of the object graph.
You could do a shallow copy by getting a snapshot of
the fields of the object. Then wrap up the children
objects with Versioned.makeVersioned(child) when
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 09:57 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Yes, its a deep copy which is why I require Serializable.
new MarshalledObject(obj).get();
Maybe there is a better way to make copies?
Yes. I wrote an object copier service for just this type for
situation. In CMP the spec requires
Title: fcqgadkmgnfanegufjeghdyh
Türkiyenin
En Kaliteli En Farklý En Geniþ Porno Arþivi
100% Sert Sex Videolarý
Genç kýzlar manken olma vaadiyle kandýrýlýyor, ve acýmasýzca tecavüz edilerek kýzlýklarý
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
That might be a problem if you have a big object
graph.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 06:23:39PM +0200, Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
It's not the new look that is bad (the red bar and the menu) its all the
other stuff that blinks worse than your average porn site. An eyesore. Too
much stuff that just bounces around.
I second that... It looks like a christmas
Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
It's not the new look that is bad (the red bar and the menu) its all the
other stuff that blinks worse than your average porn site. An eyesore. Too
much stuff that just bounces around.
You a regular average porn site browser, Juha?
I agree though, there's too much flashing
Patches item #711081, was opened at 2003-03-27 17:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=711081group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Fawcett (fawce)
Assigned to:
I think it is reasonable to validate that the default implementation in
java.lang.Object has been overridden, but beyond that the developer
should be left to shoot themselves in the foot. I too have used Victor's
pattern of a common abstract base class that contained the
implementation and that
i had the problem with the vm you are using.
hi jboss gurus,
do you guys have any ideas? i have seen a lot of postings on the jboss
forum about the same problem but no clear solution.
thanks,
felipe
nick wrote:
We had similar problems with Sun j2sdk1.4.1_02 on Redhat linux 7.3. We
could only
I cant access the site!! been trying for sometime now!! http 500!
-Original Message-
From: Luke Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site
Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
It's not the new look that
Hi,
possible another bug. When i enter the project site, i get no content in the
middle. Is it a bug or a problem with my browser (mozilla 1.3 on Linux)?
Regards
Bernd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Little bug:
- go to User registration/login
- press Retrieve lost password
result:
Module
I think it looks good in general but on my Mac, I have to have the window
almost as big as my screen (15.2 Powerbook) to get the whole layout in...
Instead of re-sizing as I make the window smaller, I get scroll bars... So
perhaps you have some tables that are forcing a large layout?
From: marc
The Sun JVM seems to be sensitive to the system date and time!
(If it's set for times in the past, say a few years back, it
fails, set current time and it works. I understand this may
be a log4j issue.)
We've seen it when doing auto-installed deployment to new
hardware when the hw clock is far
So, I realize this is just out of the gate, but is there any doco on the
Nukes stuff yet? Interested to see if I can use some of it in my projects.
:-)
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:30:46 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net
I'm sure they did do some testing...
A couple of little nitpicks (my opinions):
The layer pull down menus are inconsistent. Either all of the menu bar items
should have pull downs or none... It is weird to scroll across and sometimes
have the drop down layer pop up.
The 'Company' link goes back
66 matches
Mail list logo
