[JBoss-dev] Small NPE annoyance in LRU cache

2001-03-23 Thread marc fleury
va:358) [Auto deploy] at org.jboss.ejb.AutoDeployer.run(AutoDeployer.java:221) [Auto deploy] at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) _____ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.s

RE: [JBoss-dev] Access

2001-03-28 Thread marc fleury
There is no centralized repository at this point... hack one in the container factory I am surprised you can't browse the home from JNDI though, that smells of "bad config" to me marc -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J.

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbossmx - Imported sources

2001-03-29 Thread marc fleury
FINALLY, thanks stacy Ok we can manage the clusters of JMX instances ANYONE UP FOR A SIMPLE STATEFUL BEAN Come on guys! i can believe you talk so much and when the request for real stuff comes in, all the "experts" run away... COME ON SOMETHING, ANYTHING in CVS will impress me, THAT

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rewrite of ejb.jar, et al

2001-03-29 Thread marc fleury
No except the "tools" which we shouldn't use (the 8082 port stuff) for the rest it is kosher. Reminds me we should really rewrite the tools ourselves... I will get there with EJB soon. marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/business binary.html

2001-03-29 Thread marc fleury
when can I make noise about this phox marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:47 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/business binary.html | | |

[JBoss-dev] Branches and Tags

2001-04-01 Thread marc fleury
would really be kick ass. Or send the detailed email and I will put it in the format etc... marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net

RE: [JBoss-dev] Branches and Tags

2001-04-01 Thread marc fleury
Ok got the simone mail, thanks, will put it online marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc |fleury |Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 6:15 PM |To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |Subject: [JBoss-dev] Branches and Tags | | |I

RE: [JBoss-dev] Clustering dev: help about proxies

2001-04-02 Thread marc fleury
|Hello Vladimir, | |I think I have found what was my problem. | |As I am trying to set the RemoteContainer reference in a serializable |structure *directly* on the server i.e. without using the RMI sub-system, I |need to explicitely get the stub before playing with the reference i.e. |store the

RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?

2001-04-03 Thread marc fleury
I am interested in a "basic" zip with source and binary, available for download. A private company proposed to do the installers for the stable versions. The problem is still QA that requires time and knowledge. Please go ahead with your proposal, let us know when you have something marc

RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?

2001-04-03 Thread marc fleury
, 2001 10:15 AM |To: marc fleury; Kimpton,C (Chris); |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds? | | |I would be happy to help out with integrating the |JUnit test stuff with a build/distribution... Just |let me know... | |cheers, |peter | | |--- marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: SV: [JBoss-dev] EJB deploy/undeploy problem

2001-04-03 Thread marc fleury
1- don't play with /tmp it is JBoss only 2- this is jboss-user material. Folks it seems that there is so much demand for support on jboss-user that it spills over to jboss-dev. We will move the list jboss-user to forum format ASAP as it is crumbling under its own weight. Please be strict in

RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?

2001-04-03 Thread marc fleury
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:32 AM |To: marc fleury; Kimpton,C (Chris); |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds? | | |Yes. | |Sorry about dropping in and out. Hope I can be |forgiven. When consulting is slow jboss contribution |is high, when consu

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBoss 2.2 FINAL. And the tests ?

2001-04-04 Thread marc fleury
OK 2.2 is really of FINAL quality. We have been really in a effective BETA for the past 3 month and I don't see people complaining on major stuff. The test situation is a bit more complex. JCTS has come a long way. JBossTest had things that made deep tests (the home.create(objectref)) that do

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBoss 2.2 FINAL. And the tests ?

2001-04-04 Thread marc fleury
|To: JBoss Development Mailing List (E-mail) |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBoss 2.2 FINAL. And the tests ? | | |OK. | |The timeline of 18:00 GMT is confirmed. | |Simon | | -Original Message- | From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: mercoled 4 aprile 2001 16:09 | To: Bordet

[JBoss-dev] is it working?

2001-04-04 Thread marc fleury
it is bery bery quiet marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

RE: [JBoss-dev] SLSB remote and home : idea

2001-04-06 Thread marc fleury
Stateless doesn't do anything on the server (just creates a proxy) so yes that could be merged. However if you use security then you are stuck. There is no way you are going to code the interposition in the client (create() is on a role only for example) in case of stateful you do have a call on

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMX in jBoss, Clustering, Monitoring, Failover, better bootstrapp ing via pluggable XMLet

2001-04-06 Thread marc fleury
|Hello, I'd like to tell you about the code that I've developed and |contributed to JBoss. Thank you stacy, when we first talked over the phone 3 month ago, I thought you were not for real, you have proven me wrong and I am glad I trusted you with a RW passwd without prior work. Comments below,

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] bug when server is under load

2001-04-10 Thread marc fleury
for what it is worth, the notion of pools becomes a bit moot for stateless objects (the capsule). The VM should be able to create and collect the instances of TX you throw at it. Pools also lead to complex code (Cleaning up in a lock like you describe), and while it will work, we end up with

RE: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-11 Thread marc fleury
anks Scott, | |This is it. | |How you choose to differentiate between JBoss Service |MBeans and 3rd party ones is what I think the |discussion should hinge upon. | |Jules | | - Original Message - | From: "marc fleury" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: "[EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-11 Thread marc fleury
As opposed to the current Configuration Service that already pases the MLet semantics to XML??? why? marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Lemoine David-dlemoi01 |Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:05 AM |To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-11 Thread marc fleury
Bla enough talk, add the f*cking line already ||I still don't see anything wrong with type check for ||org.jboss.util.Service. ||Vladimir "code with your balls on the keyboard" ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java

2001-04-11 Thread marc fleury
It is legacy at this point. We used to run 2.0 BETA and then move to 2.0 FINAL. marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Toby |Allsopp |Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:11 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS

RE: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-11 Thread marc fleury
to MBeanServer to use other |classloader nor did | JMX engineers hooked wires for CCLs. So as soon ClassNotFoundException is | caught (inside MbeanServer.isInstanceOf) false is returnd :( | | Feedback? | | vlada | | | On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, marc fleury wrote: | | Bla enough t

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS client/ssh

2001-04-12 Thread marc fleury
nable amount of time anyway. I thought it was a |matter of a dialog check box or two... how naive I |was!! Thanks Simone! | |On to real work... | |--- marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | |Cool, I'm vindicated! | | | |When Simone imparts his knowledge, I'd be happy to | |update the web page if

RE: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-12 Thread marc fleury
at all, the server.getClass().getName() which if it returns Service is good for the management operations. Never compare the class, it's a bitch go with the string if you can marc |-Original Message- |From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:32 AM

RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-12 Thread marc fleury
xpose 1000 things etc etc... I need to rethink also the separation of services from SPINE (current conf) and service from APP SERVER (current jcml) marc | |Cheers, |David. | |-Original Message- |From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: 12 April 2001 03:58 |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |S

RE: [JBoss-dev] The new Service solution

2001-04-13 Thread marc fleury
|2. The org.jboss.configuration.ConfigurationService mbean now registers all |mbeans loaded from the jboss.jcml configuration file with the |ServiceControl mbean. |There is no requirement that an mbean implements the |org.jboss.util.Service interface. ... h you are saying that when

RE: [JBoss-dev] The new Service solution

2001-04-13 Thread marc fleury
|Were talking about the org.jboss.util.Service interface still. All |the SC does |now is maintain an ordered list of Service instances and it invokes the |init/start/stop/destory methods in the registration order on these |as before. |Now it is invoking through a Service interface rather than the

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/business contrib.html binary.html cvs.html doco.html faq.html jboss-overview.html jboss-projects.html jboss-server.html jboss-third.html lists.html menu.html news.html team.html testimonials.html

2001-04-13 Thread marc fleury
time to rewrite this site using taglibs don't you think ??? jboss:menu look="developers" I am really warming up to this cutsy things, those "TagLibs" whachamacalitz, they make me giggle like a little girl... like a "leeetllle giirl" marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/business contrib.html binary.html cvs.html doco.html faq.html jboss-overview.html jboss-projects.html jboss-server.html jboss-third.html lists.html menu.html news.html team.html testimonials.html

2001-04-13 Thread marc fleury
| |At 18:21 13.4.2001 -0400, you wrote: |time to rewrite this site using taglibs don't you think ??? | |yes, maintaining the current site sucks big donkey dicks tell me about it... slurp slurp... marc ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] DependencyManager jboss.dependencies

2001-04-14 Thread marc fleury
|From my investigation I would say that it is not being used anywhere |inside of the jboss project. If this is true, it might be a good |idea to at |least remove the jboss.dependencies from the conf/default directory so that |it does not confuse anyone. correct, |I think that the

[JBoss-dev] JBoss-user questions on JBoss-dev

2001-04-14 Thread marc fleury
JBoss-user is overflowing, there is a steady stream of newcomers and new developers that help people but the user base is outpacing the developer base. We are seeing a recrudescence of mails that are purely support questions on this list. I will ask all of you to stand fast and be FIRM in

[JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] Flushing Cache (For Simone ?)

2001-04-18 Thread marc fleury
That is pretty cool post it to jboss-dev francois, |So we created our own LRUEnterpriseContextCachePolicy class to be able |to passivate beans with JMS messages. We actually call the ageOut |method with the beans key we want to flush by going through the LRUList |obtains from getList() method.

[JBoss-dev] I'm here

2001-04-19 Thread marc fleury
www.fgm.com funky stuff washington, marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] He he

2001-04-21 Thread marc fleury
1500 downloads per day freshmeat helps it seems, let's win this war... marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net

[JBoss-dev] Atlanta training -- only 3 places left

2001-04-23 Thread marc fleury
sourceforge, JBoss is making it big time so let's keep it this way, regards _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: binaries - Imported sources

2001-04-25 Thread marc fleury
Thanks scott, It was originally a micheal j idea, I just wanted to acknowledge that marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:25 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS

RE: [JBoss-dev] JavaOne

2001-04-25 Thread marc fleury
We are giving a BOF, mandatory presence for all those on this list, free tshirts marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason |Dillon |Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 12:40 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] JavaOne | |

RE: [JBoss-dev] JavaOne

2001-04-25 Thread marc fleury
Party on the beach? what party on the beach? try forced marches in the morning, brain excercise for lunch, 120 pushups in the afternoon, endoctrination for dinner, and rifle manipulation at night... or you think we run this revolutionary group on Peace Love and good Code alone ? well, yeah, we

RE: [JBoss-dev] Bug in jnp (handling references to remote JNDI servers)

2001-04-25 Thread marc fleury
We are getting you a rw passwd, go ahead and fix what you want. marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Anatoly Akkerman |Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:54 PM |To: JBoss-Dev |Subject: [JBoss-dev] Bug in jnp (handling references to

RE: [JBoss-dev] JavaOne

2001-04-25 Thread marc fleury
can you believe it was going to be Telkel at a time :) hope we will work together in the future marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Schaefer, Andreas |Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:05 PM |To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' |Subject: RE:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Connection Pool - Help!

2001-04-25 Thread marc fleury
DO NOT ANSWER JBOSS-USER ON THIS LIST marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Filip |Hanik |Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:15 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Connection Pool - Help! | | |it is the deployment

RE: [JBoss-dev] Any objections to cut over to jboss-j2ee jars in main branch

2001-04-26 Thread marc fleury
if it just works :) of course there is no objection. Make sure that the test are ok and put it in, marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay |Walters |Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:48 AM |To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' |Subject:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Bug in jnp (handling references to remote JNDI servers)

2001-04-26 Thread marc fleury
| To fix this, all proxy objects need to know the host, they are | originating from. If you really want to do that (because you really need to use the code you just showed us) then go ahead and work on the JNP stub classes also the home must be able to extract that information from the IC (is

RE: [JBoss-dev] J2ee jar files

2001-04-27 Thread marc fleury
Listen at least the name jboss-j2ee is clear, no need to make it complicated. Don't be silly... marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay |Walters |Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 3:55 PM |To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' |Subject: [JBoss-dev]

RE: [JBoss-dev] J2ee jar files

2001-04-27 Thread marc fleury
it up to the list, but I would have missed the |j2ee.jar thing |on my own as my history has been unsullied by the ri implementation. | |Cheers | |-Original Message- |From: marc fleury |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 4/27/01 4:13 PM |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] J2ee jar files | |Listen at least

[JBoss-dev] SUPPORT OF JBOSS --IMPORTANT-- PLEASE READ

2001-04-28 Thread marc fleury
available and willing talent. If we embark in that activity as JBG, we'll have to streamline and coordinate it. Hence your answer is *very important* to get started. More on the subject in the near future if indeed resources prove available. Regards _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] Website down,

2001-04-30 Thread marc fleury
There was some maintance done this weekend and it went awry. Juha and Myself are in London we'll see you soon :) marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

RE: [JBoss-dev] Added support for handles to remember their container

2001-05-02 Thread marc fleury
|This would simplify the configuration, by eliminating the need for a |handle-jndi.properties file. This same mechanism could also be |used to plug |in a HA aware InitialContextHandle impl that would use jini, raw multicast |or whatever to find a suitable container. Please remove the

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss/servlet container test suite???

2001-05-03 Thread marc fleury
One thing we can do is build an object that we invoke and return on a servlet-EJB method. In the object we overwrite the writeExternal method to set a variable to serializedTrue in case it is serialized. It indicates failure to not serialize the objects. marc |-Original Message-

RE: [JBoss-dev] User Transactions

2001-05-03 Thread marc fleury
yes for a long time now marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Daniel Cardin |Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:55 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] User Transactions | | |Are UserTransactions fully implemented now ? I'd

[JBoss-dev] I am getting sick... CONTAINER FACTORY

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
feeling sick. marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] ServiceControl notes

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
will not be called and we only call the managed bit, again a lightweight solution. marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss

[JBoss-dev] jboss.properties, let's deprecate it

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
that it is not necessarily pointing to the local file system. Hence the following should be done through that, who wrote this? # Tomcat session Id generation. Uncomment to make Tomcat initial request faster # tomcat.sessionid.randomclass=java.util.Random _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] METHOD-INVOCATION

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
to the principal somewhere else? marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
you guys know I hate repackaging) it would enable us to put the xml classes in something else than the base spine but have the stuff loaded as an MLet from the conf in the beginning. marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: JBossCMP 1.1 FAST!

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
|but I think I saw a post earlier, prepared statements or regular |statements, |we are talking about buckets when we need to melt an iceberg. huh people start talking like me... good. |the huge performance problems doesn't lie in the CMP logic not using |prepared statements. that's right it

RE: [JBoss-dev] EJB call other EJB

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
post this to user marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Saint-Martin Cecile |Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:48 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] EJB call other EJB | | |Hi, | |I have a problem : EJB A

RE: [JBoss-dev] Vrifier

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
we were having the worst time getting this to work in London, in fact I remember a night where Juha stayed up until 2 am and couldn't get that and EJBDoclet to work easily (I was watching late night poker). If you had a small howto ;) marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up | | |marc fleury wrote: | | Ok is the patchdir stuff used at all? | |I've used that a couple of times. | | | | | marc | | _ | Marc Fleury, Ph.D | [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: JBossCMP 1.1 FAST!

2001-05-07 Thread marc fleury
|If I hear no objections, I'll get rid of the code attempting to update |the primary key columns. please go ahead, this is really where our performance lies... in the db.. marc | |-danch | | |___ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/tm TransactionManagerService.java TransactionManagerServiceMBean.java TxCapsule.java

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
@@ |* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Marc Fleury/a |* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Ole Husgaard/a |* | - * @version $Revision: 1.25 $ | + * @version $Revision: 1.26 $ |*/ | class TxCapsule implements TimeoutTarget | { | @@ -66,29 +66,10

RE: [JBoss-dev] resource-ref resource-managers in jboss.xml

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
|My understanding is that the purpose of the double indirection is |to make the |case where you have many beans and many resources in the the one file more |manageable. Yes the reason is that. If you have many beans and one db it becomes very useful. Say for example you deploy 120 beans as

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss.properties, let's deprecate it

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
| what is with the RMI stuff? | # System properties | # These will be loaded and set by jBoss | #java.rmi.server.useLocalHostName=true | #java.rmi.server.hostname=localhost | #java.rmi.server.codebase=http://localhost:8080/ | |I don't know about webinstalls, but I know it is handy to have. I have

RE: [JBoss-dev] ServiceControl notes

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
|Marc, | |Someone has already implemented something that has the |same effect. Yes I know and I am not really happy with. The JMX naming solution seems very lightweight to me and still won't call your classes when you register them if you don't define JBoss as scoping. If and when we do the

[JBoss-dev] ContainerFactory cont.

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
use it? marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
That plugin should really do something about the finally of the invoke method (same with home). Such as returning from call bla bla marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list

[JBoss-dev] JRMPContainerInvoker questions

2001-05-08 Thread marc fleury
it. This is in line with the externalization of other interceptors and the bit being also hard to read. Maintainability, maintainability, maintainability, the rest is beer-piss. marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
clean it up | | |The patchdir thing is something that I added so that one could |create a patch |of a given binary release. It was how I tested the initial JBossSX stuff. | |- Original Message - |From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 7:33 PM

RE: [JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
on in arbitrary detail at the flick of a JMX |switch. | |- Original Message - |From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] |To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:55 AM |Subject: [JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor | | | That plugin should really do something

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO List on SourceForge

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
if it is gone ... good :))) marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott |M Stark |Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:20 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO List on SourceForge | | |Where are you seeing the use of

RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Vrifier

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
done marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ingo |Bruell |Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:16 PM |To: marc fleury |Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Vrifier | | |Hi marc, | |mf we were having the worst time getting this to work in London

RE: [JBoss-dev] ContainerFactory cont.

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
call to stacks initialization |ContainerInterceptors.addInterceptors(container, transType, | metricsEnabled, conf.getContainerInterceptorsConf()); | ? | | Does anyone else use it? | | marc | | _ | Marc Fleury, Ph.D | [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-dev] METHOD-INVOCATION

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
| 2- The security, do we associate the Principal to the ctx |somewhere else? I | don't believe we should associate to the ctx (see warning in |source, I also | need to update these). Scott do you take care of associating the |ctx to the | principal somewhere else? | |The prinicpal identity and

RE: [JBoss-dev] METHOD-INVOCATION

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
. | |- Original Message - |From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:13 PM |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] METHOD-INVOCATION | | | | | 2- The security, do we associate the Principal to the ctx | |somewhere else? I | | don't believe we should associate

RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up

2001-05-09 Thread marc fleury
-strapping) or will there still be two files? | |--jason | |On Wed, 9 May 2001, marc fleury wrote: | | |The setting of the security manager and server.policy file are | |better done from | |the command line as many security related events and debugging hooks are | |done on startup of the vm. I don't

RE: [JBoss-dev] Option D - Take One!

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
you didn't read the excercise I gave you did you please read the excercise vinay it explain a much faster way to do the "invalidate". (for the others, this is in fact one of the excercise we do on the last day of the training and I wrote it specifically for Vinay but it is now part

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Option D - Take One !

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
Vinay, // The valid variables, make it a hashset Map validContext; invoke(MI mi) { try { // Use the cache key, it is safe if (!validContext.contains(((EntityEnterpriseContext) mi.getEnterpriseContext()).key) { //The context is not in the map, it will be loaded

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Option D - Take One !

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
Simone, really, this is not a cache decision, AT ALL. The state synchronization is the state synchronization with the DB, it is a different domain. The cache should not, does not, will not take state synchronization decisions with respect to the database. It is a store with passivation

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Option D - Take One !

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
|I would have written a simple TimerTask in a LRU cache policy, as I've done |for the stateful bean removal. and I would have removed it |The issues (entity beans invalidation and stateful beans removal) are very |similar, aren't they ? no, like not at all. One deals with memory of the

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Option D - Take One !

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
). PLUG The training can turn all of you in container developers /PLUG. So you go and get that algo right and lightweight and we put it in. regards marc PS: PLEASE READ THE CLASS EXCERCISE AND MY PREVIOUS MAIL :) | |Cheers, | |Vinay | |Just took a loo |- Original Message - |From: marc

RE: [JBoss-dev] Option D - Take Two!

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
invalidation next time on. | ctxToInvalidate.clear(); | } |} |} |} | | | | |- Original Message - |From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 7:58 PM |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Option D - Take One ! | | | |Marc

RE: [JBoss-dev] Option D - Take Two!

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
|- Original Message - |From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:20 PM |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Option D - Take Two! | | | Almost, | | | The name is misleading the ones that are in the map we know for sure that | will be valid since the next

RE: [JBoss-dev] add-on for JBOSS

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
Hello, yes it is legal to develop commercial add-ons to JBoss. In fact if you wanted to sell it through JBoss.org we would put it on our download page and charge for every sale. We are a distribution channel and your sales help pay for the development of the core. marc |-Original

[JBoss-dev] Booth hitchiking

2001-05-11 Thread marc fleury
the show so people can recognize me:) your help is greatly appreciated _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss

RE: [JBoss-dev] add-on for JBOSS

2001-05-12 Thread marc fleury
companies give an input on this. | |-Aswath | |From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] add-on for JBOSS |Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 23:19:04 -0400 | |Hello, | |yes it is legal to develop commercial add-ons to JBoss. | |In fact

RE: [JBoss-dev] TR: [JBoss-user] Obscure issue (bug?) with CMP using column mapping

2001-05-12 Thread marc fleury
c'est quoi ton probleme exactement? marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Vincent Harcq |Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 1:16 PM |To: Dev JBoss |Subject: [JBoss-dev] TR: [JBoss-user] Obscure issue (bug?) with CMP |using column mapping |

[JBoss-dev] WebSite unified look

2001-05-12 Thread marc fleury
from the JBossServer template page. JBossMail JBossTest JBossSoap JBossSX JBossTX JBossCX JBossCMP JBossMQ thanks marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-dev] EJBHome object creation?

2001-03-26 Thread marc fleury
Wrong wrong wrong... | interface extending EJBHome is implemented and exported as a | UnicastRemoteObject. Exactly how is this object created and the Home | interface of the provider bean implemented? |JBoss uses the class java.lang.reflect.Proxy to generate proxy |implementations of the bean's

RE: [JBoss-dev] Booth hitchiking

2001-05-13 Thread marc fleury
that you'll be 15 feet in front of the BEA booth... | | |--On Friday, May 11, 2001 7:37 PM -0400 marc fleury |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |wrote: | | Ah the great days when Telkel was fully funded and we could |afford a booth | at JavaONE. | | This year, i am a guerillero, I come with my weapons loaded my

RE: [JBoss-dev] PATCHES

2001-04-02 Thread marc fleury
Put this online... somewhere... i can't think of a good page right now. We need a participating page with the new todo list. there are a 1000 things to do, the directives for submittal, joining teams, joining leaders, code style, patch submittal, devettiquette etc etc like the old game over

[JBoss-dev] Tis quiet on JBoss-dev

2001-05-14 Thread marc fleury
:) so scott stark and myself are giving training in Atlanta and the list is dead? ah come on, it will make us feel like without us there is nothing going us but the rent. marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-dev] What is the difference between the two JRMPContainerInvoker ?

2001-05-16 Thread marc fleury
hear hear... marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sacha |Labourey |Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 5:46 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] What is the difference between the two |JRMPContainerInvoker ? | | | i believe

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java Scope.java ScopedURLClassLoader.java package.html

2001-05-19 Thread marc fleury
| Log: | First official try for a scoped application deployer that is |able to build | virtual applications out of dependent earĀ“s. Currently reads |dependency information | from property file. setup of application management information hum what is this reads dependency information from

RE: [JBoss-dev] jo! integration

2001-05-19 Thread marc fleury
hey, we are always interested in integrating 3rd party servlet engines, please take a look at the Tomcat and Jetty integration. You want the hotdeploy ClassLoader integration, the naming and security integration as well. marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] invalidation of cache on demand

2001-05-19 Thread marc fleury
Someone pointed out the fact that invalidating the state of an instance remotely through an ejbRemote call was a useful thing for them. Does anyone want to take this on? Does anyone else have use for this? marc _ Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Inital Checkin of J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer was AW: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:

2001-05-30 Thread marc fleury
Nachricht- |Von: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Mai 2001 16:17 |An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: |jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java |Scope.java ScopedURLClassLoader.java package.html | | || Log: || First

RE: [JBoss-dev] Directory structure of jboss projects.

2001-05-30 Thread marc fleury
It's a good point, the more I think about the current JBoss, and the more I realize that the base JMX server and XMLet and the other basic mechanisms are far more generic than what we percieve. I believe the General Purpose Architecture is that MBeanServer by itself, the container factory

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment

2001-05-30 Thread marc fleury
I am unclear as to what we are discussing right now, but the MLet supports the URL loading (it is a URLClassLoader). Ie you can have configuration and classes live on a central http server. However for the pure web based installation to work we need to make sure that a few things are squared

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss-jetty.01-05-21.tgz

2001-05-30 Thread marc fleury
|[Default] Enhydra InstantDB - Version 3.26 |[Default] Internal error - problem locking Database class |java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException I am getting rid of instantDB... redundant as a demo db... spits an ugly copyright notice :) marc | |If this is a showstopper (I have only tested

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >