[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ExpiryDestinationTestCase
It is a new test for a new feature done by Genman. 2000 messages sounds a bit stupid for a unit test. I'd guess this is a timing issue since there is no synchronization with the server state, just a sleep of 1 second, hoping that all those messages get processed in that time and the cpu is not busy doing something else like downloading your e-mail. :-) This test also doesn't tidyup after itself. It leaves all those messages in the DLQ! On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 01:07 -0600, Scott M Stark wrote: I'm seeing this org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ExpiryDestinationTestCase fail due to timing issues? The test is failing because the dlq count is not 2000. Its both below and above. Is this a reliable test? Scott Stark VP Architecture Technology JBoss Inc. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ExpiryDestinationTestCase
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3027 On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 12:26 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote: It is a new test for a new feature done by Genman. 2000 messages sounds a bit stupid for a unit test. I'd guess this is a timing issue since there is no synchronization with the server state, just a sleep of 1 second, hoping that all those messages get processed in that time and the cpu is not busy doing something else like downloading your e-mail. :-) This test also doesn't tidyup after itself. It leaves all those messages in the DLQ! On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 01:07 -0600, Scott M Stark wrote: I'm seeing this org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ExpiryDestinationTestCase fail due to timing issues? The test is failing because the dlq count is not 2000. Its both below and above. Is this a reliable test? Scott Stark VP Architecture Technology JBoss Inc. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Adrian Brock Chief Scientist JBoss Inc. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
