We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[] view of classes as far as I know. Its something to look into as another optimization/benefit of embedding the web container into JBoss.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "julien viet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:37 AM Subject: Re[11]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming > >> I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, > >> I've already done that. > > mf> there you go then, > > >> However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's > >> why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore. > > mf> Stop being such a "choupette", it is anoying. Where is the can-do > mf> attitude? you need something done at the compiler with a massive > mf> classpath WE ALREADY SOLVED THAT PROBLEM FOR JETTY (Jules and Scott > mf> did). > > yeah I saw the code one day. I am not whinning :-) > You want JSP, I'll do it no problems. > > JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler > takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. > that's not incompatible I know. > > julien ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
