If the unit tests run, it means the processdefinition is ok, your usage of the
api is ok, your expectation of what the engine does is ok, the way the
testbaseclasses use the engine etc are ok, but it does not mean and I do not
want to do any fingerpointing whatsoever, that the console uses the a
Guys (Girls?)... The history functionality, including the api are not fully
matured yet. That is what the jira issues are about. Keep a close eye on
check-ins related to those, try them out as early ass possible and comment
then. Helping out is also appreciated (if you take a look at the source,
Correct, since your unittest ends (how can the test know it has to wait for
something. If you e.g. build in a Thread.sleep(1000) loop endlessly and
check in the loop if the task has ended (do a break then) it could work. That
is *not* the way unittests are *normally* used though. The user is
Or help out developing ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258819#4258819
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4258819
___
jboss-user mailing list
jbos
According to the docs it *should* be unique, so in that case the only thing
missing according to you is a unique constraint on the database.
Personally, I make the key unique myself by using it in a 'compound' way. I
used a license plate number, followed by a colon and a date (assuming two
ins
Yes, if this does not work, "something" is wrong.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258758#4258758
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4258758
___
jbos
Yes, that is the line that 'cause the error' but the real error is that your
parser does not understand it. So maybe you are not aware of some other parser
but afaik, if a specific xml parser is loaded via jaxp, that will be used by
other applications as well. The Aefred parser is not a default
Nope, at least not yet. Searching the jira helps btw this time (due to my
own curiosity) I did it for you.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2203
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2412
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258753#425
Is it is a latitude where it is always summertime? Then I don't envy you :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258552#4258552
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4258552
__
As mentioned in several other posts and a jira issue, the history is not fullly
enabled yet. Vote for the jira issue and refer to this post there.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258412#4258412
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.h
there is no 3.3.2.GA, and rollback functionality is not there natively since it
is very dependent on the business side of things. The times I implemented
'rollback' functionality I explicitly modeled it in the process. Like you would
when e.g. sending a correcting invoice. You do not retract the
you can also add al these config files in a jar and add that to the library as
well. Or put them in a directory and add that to the library (that's what I did)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258297#4258297
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss
DUHH why do post get visible delayed... I though one of my posts
disappeared Sigh
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258239#4258239
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4258239
Is there a jira issue for this? If so, you can see the target for it being
fixed (might also be empty though). If there is no jira issue, it is not on the
list for being fixed in the near future. Please file an issue in that case.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=
look in the jira for an issue. That will tell you when it will be fixed. If
there is no issue reported please do
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258236#4258236
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply
Do you use a custom xml parser (Aelfred) ? Or a specific JDK or
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258229#4258229
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4258229
___
No, not from what I've seen in the code. Reusing taskforms in multiple tasks
and displaying the taskname sounds like a nice 'enhancement'. Please file a
Jira issue for this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258226#4258226
Reply to the post :
h
Read carefully... he had another implementation of a class with the same
package and classname but that did not implement the correct interface.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258132#4258132
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html
tasks are never associated with a state. Tasks are now just 'simple' tasks, not
'complex' tasks anymore (the task has been 'promoted' to the level of the
former task-node. That might be explicitly missing in the docs, I won't deny
that. But
What you describe is not a 'simple' scenario, it is a
afaik, there are none, butr I'm not 100% sure. If you want to be sure, look at
the console code and see what jBPM api calls are used.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4258124#4258124
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&
You cannot put individual files on the classpath, only archives (zip, jar) and
directories. Change /home/config/hibernate.cfg.xml to /home/config
And regarding 3.1.1, there also is a 3.1.4 and even that is 'old'. When
starting a new project (as you seem to do since it has not run in production)
Sounds like the wrong behaviour, but that might be a configuration issue as
well e.g. two jobexecutors
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257994#4257994
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=425799
hmm... JBPM-2537 is targeted at 4.3, I saw you added your vote to it. Great now
gather others to do the same to increase the chance of it getting fixed quicker
-;)
I'm not sure what the default behaviour in jBPM 3 is, if that is to end
(cancel) the task, the same should happen here, without hav
hmm... might be that the 'waitÃng' on dependent services only takes place when
the jboss-service.xml is used and not the jboss-beans.xml. I'll try to look
into this a little further.
Putting things in the jboss-service.xml might be an option, but I cannot find a
replacement for the property/i
oops, sorry, I now only re-read your first line that you tried it in the
'correct' order as well. Same error then?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257973#4257973
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
You have the content of the depends tag in a different order then what I
posted. Might make a big difference. Can you give that a try?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257972#4257972
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
Thanks and sorry... while I was reading your jira issue I DID find the other
one (not sure why it did not show up earlier)
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2537
So I'll close yours as a duplicate. Again, sorry
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=vie
ouch sorry typo
jboss.jca:service=DataSourceBinding,name=JbpmDS
or with the java:/ in front
This is done in the ESB which is certified on JBoss AS 4.2.3 so it should work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257947#4257947
Reply to the post :
and adding something like:
[codejboss.jca:service=DataSourceBinding,name=java:/JbpmDS
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257945#4257945
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257945
Adding a
JbpmDS
to the JbpmService in jboss-beans.xml did not work?
I'll ask some others(have no option to try myself)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257944#4257944
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posti
What error? Instead of removing the service, I'd say try to add a dependency on
JbpmDS as mentioned in my other post.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257922#4257922
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=
jbpm 3.1.1?
If it works in dev, but not production, I'd look into the differences between
those first
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257920#4257920
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=425792
I'm no jboss service /.sar specialist, but afaik, it should wait until the
datasource is deployed.
At least is does this for JBoss AS 5 in
distro/src/main/files/install/src/jboss/config.jboss5/deploy/jbpm/jbpm-service.sar/jbpm-service-jboss-beans.xml
for 4 in
distro/src/main/files/install/src
It should be on the classpath.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257903#4257903
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257903
___
jboss-user mailing list
1: Depends on what you mean by 'integrate'. What are you trying to achieve.
2: Sounds like a warning from hibernate/jpa. You might have more luck asking
(also) there.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257901#4257901
Reply to the post :
http://w
An interesting read in this regard is:
http://groups.google.com/group/rest-bpm/web/submission-1-rest--workflow-bpm
Not sure what comes out of this...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257899#4257899
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/inde
Hmmm I thought I already responded.
To me it is a bug, but others might think not so (not sure what their arguments
would be).
please file a jira issue, I do not seem to be able to find one
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257894#4257894
Reply
To create transaction 'boundaries', use 'async' on the activities. That makes
them run in a separate transaction from the main process.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257834#4257834
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
Yes, use a plain fork-join for this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257827#4257827
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257827
___
jboss-user mailin
You are probably posting the rest now, but try with the latest 3.2.6SPx first
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257691#4257691
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257691
_
with or without the java: prefix? And what about the name in the config file?
Does that contain the prefix or not?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257677#4257677
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
no there is not. And not sure if it will return as it was or whether
alternative ways (more bpmn like) will be implemented.
What is the behaviour you need?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257650#4257650
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.o
ok, now the pd looks correct.
Can you make a full unitest like described in my post in
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=158610
So we can see in what step it fails, use that to (probably) fix the problem.
Can you also provide debug logs for the accompanying test?
If you
Do you have a unittest that I can run? You do not demonstrate where you want to
end the process instance.
And what doe you mean by 'over-complicated'? Nothing from your post points to
something that is complicated, let alone over-complicated. It might be a bug,
yes, but over-complicated it is n
But do this IN your NEW command, not using one of 'ours' and do filtering
afterwards.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257622#4257622
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257622
___
Sebastian is partly right, for the full meaning of my 'great' look at
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=158610
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257621#4257621
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&
yes look at the query api's
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257619#4257619
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257619
___
jboss-user mailing list
jbo
- Yes
- Yes, but you might need other changes as well if there have been core/console
related enhancements (check the jira, but even that is not always a guarantee)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257618#4257618
Reply to the post :
http://www.
Your last two remarks are not jBPM specific. jBPM 3 uses EJB timers by default
and they use the DefaultDS since they are not jbpm specifc. (you need a
DefaultDS to for JMS etc...
Not sure though if this has changed in 3.2(.7) trunk.
And there have been some other changes regarding db stuff in
What the 3 console does (and I in my JSF console) is draw the rectangles in
DHTML, so the image stays the same. Nice thing about that is that you can also
display other details of a node on e.g. mouse-over etc.
I'm not sure how the GWT console for 4 does this btw, might be like you do it
or lik
They are considered 'async' by default.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257465#4257465
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257465
___
jboss-user mail
create your own command?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257464#4257464
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257464
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-
is the ds deployed at all? Can you check via the AS console?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257463#4257463
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257463
__
Have a look at the sourcecode of the console or the jbpm testcase on how this
is done (have no time to do that myself)
things like 'grep -R getResourceAsStream |grep -v target |grep -v svn' work
amazingly well if you do not have an ide at hand)
I also found processDefinition.getImageResourceNa
ok, and I only now see there are 3 identical timers on the transition. Can you
remove those and also turn up the loglevel when running the unittest.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257457#4257457
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
might be because the process is actually already ended Can you check?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257316#4257316
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257316
getResourceAsStream (like you normally would loading an image from a classpath
;-)) om the RepositoryService.
You just have to know the name of the image as it was deployed in the process
archive.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257309#4257
anonymous wrote : But for a wokflow Web Application, it's exhausted to set
pre-conditions from state_n to state_n+1.
Can you elaborate... I miss the difference with normal webapps
How/when do you set preconditions, and why do you think this is not possible
with workflow (framework) based appli
fork/join pairs have to be fully nested. Task 1 is used in both fork1 and fork
2 at the same time.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257289#4257289
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257289
__
Search the forum.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257244#4257244
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257244
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-use
there was a change in the businesscalendar config afaik between 4.0, and 4.1
(or was it towards 4.2, not fully sure). Did you change versions? If so, search
the jira for the related task and see if it is the possible cause.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=v
3.3.0 == 3.2.5, 3.3.1 == 3.2.6. Have you tried the latest version already (keep
in mind that the 3.3 branch was dropped)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257242#4257242
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
it is read from the processdefinition xml file itself.
Which task is active is based on the name.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257241#4257241
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257241
___
unfortunately there is no way other then e.g. repackaging your classes per
version and using that package name in the processdefinition. (if someone else
has another creative solution, please post it here)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257104
There eventually will be. The jBPM side of things is kind of identical to what
is in 3, but the ESB side for the async callback needs to change.
For the moment it is indeed something that can/needs to be done in a custom node
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op
Yes I think you do need that. Would be nice if you made a unit test first to
test if that really works. I think it does, but not completely sure.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257102#4257102
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.htm
Funny, that many people are afraid of using trunk when all unit test are green,
but do want to take a chance (and put (a lot of ) effort in it) to get an
official release, try to find patches/diffs which might depend on other things
solved (or not) and user that. But that is up to ecerybody else
please try 4.1 first and search the jira if there are/were any issues regarding
deleting things (I think there are/were)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257073#4257073
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
oh, in addition, in 4 the tasks remains open, also not what you want I think.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257066#4257066
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257066
"The European guy" wrote : I managed to use a timer to make the engine take a
timeout transition after some time. My question here: If you make the engine
take the transition like this is the previous task completed? Or is this the
wrong approach and I should just change the assignment of the ta
I have to take my previous comment back. I thought one was for the xsd, one
for parsing. I'll only pick up one for the xsd/parsing (the GPD is not my cup
of tea).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257046#4257046
Reply to the post :
http://www
Great
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257044#4257044
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257044
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jbos
One day late, and afternoon already since this response required a little
digging for me :-)
In theory you are right, escalating is a basic BPM-thing
In practical situations howeever, escalation differs from company to company,
department to department etc... and if you have a look at
http:/
But keep in mind that this is my personal opinion, not one of the jBPM team.
I did it several times with different projects and it saved a lot of time
patching and stuff...
BUT always go over the jira issues (open and closed) since it might be that
a 'nightly' version can run when used in
No idea since you posted only a very small part of what is normally expected to
be posted, http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=158610 we
do not know what you do.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257014#4257014
Reply to t
And you can always use the latest source from trunk, run all tests, do a
functionality test on your application and if it works, just use that. Why not?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257013#4257013
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/i
jBPM3? or 4?
You can put the execution (4) or token (3) in a specific node.
There are no real best practices for this since every situation is different
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257012#4257012
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/
Correct, from where we are now, it is something for the dev forum.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257010#4257010
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257010
I'll pick these two issues up myself since I need them to in the not so distant
future.
Regarding specifying it, no it does not get picked up (from what I have seen)
so it should be 'parsed' as well. This is not difficult, just adding a few
lines in JpdlParser.java
View the original post :
h
Sounds like an omission in the xsd. But it could also be that the parser does
not read it (yet) even if you set it in the jpdl file (I checked the source and
afaics it does get parsed. So please file a jira issue for the combined issue
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2375
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256869#4256869
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256869
___
jboss-user
The 4.1 docs are also online now
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256865#4256865
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256865
___
jboss-user mailing
Nils,
This clearly is related to the xml parser that is used. There has been a
previous post in this area in the forum afaik. Please try to find that article
and see if it solves your problem as well (it is not jBPM related)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op
Jeff,
Something went missing in your post in step 4
Ronald
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256856#4256856
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256856
__
PLEASE. read the first and sticky post in this forum and especially act
upon the 'searching' thing.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256853#4256853
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=42
when 4.2 is released can be seen in the roadmap in the wiki (and maybe in the
jira) so please have a look there.
Workarounds:
- use a different database
- implement a custom id generator yourself
- don't restart things
:-) (just kidding ofcourse)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/
ok, thanks for clarifying this. If you can see in the source that the methods
are in fact missing (or e.g. private) please file a jira issue since I think
they should be there.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256757#4256757
Reply to the post :
Sebastian,
There are a small number of situations where the hibernate config in relation
to the getters and setters in the related classes are not fully correct. This
might also be one of those situations. So when reading the info back from the
database, not everything is 'set'.
I have no acce
This is a clear description, thanks. If the same is true for 4.1, please just
file a jira issue. Solutions come after that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256603#4256603
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posti
Yep, same here (and the relocation as you mention is old... the redirect was
kind of automatic)
I notified some people
Looks like the '.0' is removed.
http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v4/userguide/html_single/
works
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p
works here no problems...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256583#4256583
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256583
___
jboss-user mailing list
j
Maven files are called pom.xml
and surprise surprise it is in modules/pvm
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256568#4256568
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256568
Well, I was sure I'd seen the same error before, but indeed not in the jira,
but in the forum:
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4253641#4253641
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbpm-dev/2009-August/003121.html
Obviously, no solution yet, but if with loops you mean recurs
you do not have to 'strip out' the pvm. In the source it is a (maven) module
and you can build it separately very easily. Not sure why the choice was made
to put it under the same project, but it does not lead to big problems afaik.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modul
afaik, there is a jira issue about this same error and it might or not ;-))
even be fixed in the svn
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256506#4256506
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256506
Exact? No, probably not, but:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2389
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2442
Will make up for it, won't it?
and maybe:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2416
And yes, you might consider this 'incomplete'...
Contributions are welcomed ;-)
V
the equivalent way is converting the jBPM 3 delegation class to a jBPM 4 one
as described in my previous post. Most of it stays the same. why don't you give
it a try and get back with more detailed questions/problems when you encounter
them
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
The basics are not different for 4, just use jBPM 4 delegation classes instead
of those for 3.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256322#4256322
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256322
___
known 'issue'. Search the forum and jira...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256277#4256277
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256277
___
jboss-user
this should work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256192#4256192
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256192
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@li
201 - 300 of 5124 matches
Mail list logo
