I've currently got a native query that, as normal, is generating a
ListObject[]. It's dynamically created, and the number of columns returned
will change based on the user request (this is part of our reporting engine).
That works well.
My actual goal is to modify the return types so that,
Should be something like the following:
Query q01 = createNativeQuery(queryString, getData01);
| for (Object[] arr : q01.getResultList()) {
| Klass01 k01 = (Klass01)arr[0];
| Klass02 k02 = (Klass02)arr[1];
| // business logic goes here
| }
When dealing with odd mappings,
Yes, if we didn't mind running on a custom version of Seam. The ideal solution
here would be for Seam to allow us to override their functionality, just as we
do for user authentication... that way there wouldn't be any problem, most
people could continue to use the look-for-https-string
Does this process work with external SSL decoding?
We need to be able to mark certain pages as requiring SSL (or at least make
sure that links to the contain https:// on them); but we're setting up external
SSL decoders so the Seam app will never actually see any SSL traffic.
Is there some
In fact, it would appear according to this JIRA that there is a problem - any
thoughts as to a solution? Surely we're not the only volume-oriented business
planning to move forward in this way - I'd like to think its a solved problem
:-)
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1024
View
Did you ever figure out what the resolution for this was? We're having similar
issues - someone submits a page which (in our case) creates a new object and
adds it to a collection. They then press back, which since it was the same
HTML page should show the same page but about the new
That certainly seems to have been the culprit. I think its because Trinidad
automatically (somehow) installed a filter even though nothing was put into
web.xml about it that removed the image and placed it into its own
UploadedFiles object - so Seam never saw that it was sent, which is
Its a bit of a late response, but I'm not seeing any such code. We're using
Seam 2.0.0.B1 running on JBoss 4.2.1.GA if it makes a difference.
It seems from looking through the debugger at the tree that it is being seen as
a multipart request; checking the request facade shows that, as an
GOT IT - For anyone else who's searching and finds this ...
We had the trinidad jars in our library, even though we weren't using them. We
were referencing the namespace in the xmlns section of the page, but that was
it. Removing the reference and the jar files themselves suddenly made
Did the x:/ library ever get opened up? If this is available, I'd love to
take a look at it. We're about to be generating really basic (yet functionally
important to our customers) XLS reports, and this would be all we needed.
View the original post :
Thanks, I'll pull the code down and try that breakpoint. As for the examples,
I've been looking at the wiki one - are there any other files (other than those
that I posted above) that I should be checking?
View the original post :
I've been struggling with getting s:fileUpload to work with our application;
from reading the message boards it seems as if we're doing everything right,
but obviously something's missing. This is with Seam 2.0.0.B1, fwiw.
Our components.xml file contains:
web:multipart-filter
So is it a fair statement to say that delete cascading does not and will not
work on OneToMany relationships? How inconvenient.
We're using a stateful session bean (Seam) which allows us to keep changing the
object model until the user is ready to either a) save or b) cancel. On a
cancel its
Ellen,
Did you ever get this working with the simple configuration you were after?
-Richard
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4084022#4084022
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4084022
I'm having a similar problem - using MySQL as the backend (not that I think it
matters) and just the default @GeneratedValue option.
I've seen references in other sites that imply that if you use a generated
value, the Id will be updated as soon as you call persist(). In our case,
before
Sorry to resurrect a dead thread, but it seems pretty relevant.
Is there a way to correctly use SMPCs to have a truly extended context for use
with, say, a Session scope entity bean? I have a currentUser bean that's in
session scope, and it has references to various other components - I'm
Fantastic, that's the way I'll proceed then. For something like this, where
would you suggest having the factory? I don't really like adding that into the
datamodel piece (although that seems to be very common for example-scale apps);
is it more realistic to have a generic Factory class that
I should add that I'm currently doing mostly extended persistence in SFSBs, but
I do have the occasional LIE where I wasn't exepcting one (and have ended up
with a bit more in the way of defensive .merge() calls than I really like).
View the original post :
I'm splitting an existing Seam project into multiple EJB jars - one for the
data model, one for the services, et cetera.
During startup, I get this INFO log:
13:50:20,144 INFO [Component] Component: register, scope: EVENT, type:
STATEFUL_SESSION_BEAN, class: com.kimbia.actions.RegisterAction,
One more piece of information - earlier in the log, this was output:
13:50:17,113 INFO [JmxKernelAbstraction] installing MBean:
jboss.j2ee:ear=Company.ear,jar=Stateful.jar,name=RegisterAction,service=EJB3
with dependencies:
| 13:50:17,114 INFO [JmxKernelAbstraction]
More possibly useful (or misleading) information.. changing the web.xml file to
read core:init jndi-pattern=#{ejbName}/local debug=false / makes two
changes - first, Seam states:
14:16:17,124 INFO [Component] Component: register, scope: EVENT, type:
STATEFUL_SESSION_BEAN, class:
Is there any way - even a JBoss specific way - to indicate multiple virtual
hosts for a single EAR? This would allow simple deployment (and caching, etc)
for an application that presented 3 WAR files, each on a different hostname.
This can be emulated, cruftily, by having each WAR installed in
That fixed it - thanks! The wiki page made sense, unfortunately I had no idea
that the name was sensitive so I didn't even think to look for that type of
information. And the name here was different than our normal pattern (which
was chosen randomly).
This information would make a fantastic
While setting up a new server I've been having a really hard time getting it to
see a local MySQL database. The error message isn't particularly descriptive
(to me at least) and I'm reaching the end of the useful google threads. Let me
go through the steps that I've followed:
The
Its wonderful to see some good progress here. Are there plans to bring the
RichFaces package to OSX as well?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4059266#4059266
Reply to the post :
Is there any chance that we're going to see an update to the IDE availability
coinciding with JavaOne? Or am I only dreaming fond dreams?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4041993#4041993
Reply to the post :
This may be better suited for one of the other forums, but it doesn't quite fit
there, so...
These days, its a reasonable assumption that most commercial applications are
going to be deployed into a clustered environment - for failover if nothing
else, but most of them benefit from increased
I should add that I have read through (or at least searched through) the EJB3,
Cluster, and Seam forums before asking this - a lot of the information seems to
be old, or possibly incorrect, and in at least one part I saw a recent update
from Gavin saying to read the docs rather than looking
We're planning to use JBoss to do clustering for a HA webapp in the near
future. The question that I'm toying with is one of tying the JBoss cluster to
a database cluster. Our original plan was just to use Oracle RAC, but there's
certainly an investment there and it goes up fast if you need
fhh wrote : You said:
| P.S.: When I said the the hostname I use to reach your machine is entirely
under my control I was not talking about http referers. I was refering to the
idea of the original poster to make security depend on the hostname you use to
access the site.
I generally agree
I should preface this by saying that I'm very familiar with Struts, somewhat
with Spring, but new to Seam and full-fledged EJB apps in general. So this may
be a stupid question, but I can't find a good answer anywhere (probably
searching on the wrong stuff). Anyway...
I'm modelling a new
Very cool, and thanks for the response. Would it be appropriate to use
security rules to send 404s if someone tried to access one of the control
domain pages through a non-control hostname? Or would that be a perversion of
the security system and there's a much easier way to do it? I don't
I agree - let me explain myself a little better. With this setup, there's
effectively one control application that contains a large number of potentially
useful URLs. The display sites, generated by the same app, contain a much
smaller list of URLs.
When a non-control user (who doesn't even
One more clarification - I realize that this problem would disappear if I had
one application servicing all of the (multiple-hostname) contant requests, and
a totally separate application handling the administrative tasks. But from my
reading of the Seam/J2EE docs that would mean that I'd lose
Felix,
No, not terribly high volume. However, the non-admin pages are high volume.
The reason that I want cache visibility (preferably using the transparent
entity bean caching, not actually using pojoCache directly) is that updates
made to the database through the control side should be
Great - that looks like exactly what I was needing. So really I can use
actions to replace a lot of what I was using filters to do before. Very cool,
and very much the Seam way of doing business. Thanks a ton!
View the original post :
36 matches
Mail list logo
