I *believe* that we are talking around 12 months - but I'm really not sure.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124549#4124549
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4124549
___
Do you know the status of EJB 3.1?
Is this months or years away from having a production ready implementation?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124541#4124541
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
Not currently. EJB 3.1 will address this (yay!) Then some of this packaging
nightmare will go away.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124521#4124521
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4124521
__
Thanks Pete.
The loose coupling with the event seems to work well. I will continue to use
this approach until I find something better.
I did not know that the WAR classes could see the ear. Thanks for the tip.
Is it possible to deploy EJBs from the WAR?
View the original post :
http://www.j
Igor is correct, putting presentation java code in the WAR is correct. Putting
business logic in the ear is correct to. Making them communicate is harder
(this is where you want loose coupling...). Remember that the WAR can see
classes in the EAR, but not the other way around.
So, there isn't r
Does anyone know the best way around this?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4124101#4124101
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4124101
___
jboss-user m
