[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Framework and EJB3 bugs

2007-10-05 Thread supernovasoftware.com
Both http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-785 and http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-786 have been resolved. http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-474 was moved to 2.0.x How does this affect the scheduling of JBSEAM-474? View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Framework and EJB3 bugs

2007-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once AS 4.2.2.GA is released (which contains those fixes) we can get the Seam issue resolved. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4092077#4092077 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4092077

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Framework and EJB3 bugs

2007-09-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is not true. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4090008#4090008 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4090008 ___ jboss-user mailing list

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Framework and EJB3 bugs

2007-09-29 Thread supernovasoftware.com
I have been watching these issues, and the last comment implies String remove() is a spec violation for both local and remove ejb3 interfaces. If this is true what is the probability that the Seam Framework could be refactored to have a different name for this method? View the original post

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Framework and EJB3 bugs

2007-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't do much - thanks really are due to Dimitris and Carlo :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4089803#4089803 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4089803