I would recommend using the JPA APIs. (what you see in EJB3) You can still
reach down and use hibernate-specific things if you need to.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4022461#4022461
Reply to the post :
So it is not really a question of EJB3/JPA or Hibernate, but which
implementation of EJB3/JPA are you going to use. So in the examples, the ones
that say are using EJB3/JPA, yes they are following the spec, but its
implementation is Hibernate.
Hibernate implements EJB3/JPA plus it add much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : I would recommend using the JPA APIs. (what you
see in EJB3) You can still reach down and use hibernate-specific things if you
need to.
QFE. I prefer JPA over EJB3 but for simple reason that I run my software stack
on Resin which isn't exactly EJB3 compatible atm.
