There are other options.
You can f.e. create a separate table for requester's and link it to process
instances.
requester table is then a link table between process instances and your (or the
jbpm's) identity tables.
View the original post :
Olivier,
That table is in your domain model then. I would not relate it to the identity
tables
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196808#4196808
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4196808
Nor to the processinstances... use the businesskey for that
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196809#4196809
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4196809
No,
requester is part of the workflow tables.
These contain jbpm and some extra tables.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196829#4196829
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4196829
I never advise to extend the jbpm schema with extra tables Keep them
separated and I store the initial actor (and often all actors participating in
a process) in my domainmodel
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196973#4196973
Reply to the
Thanks for the tip,
Well, it depends on the requirements I guess,
I have a system where the requester want to track what's happening with their
processes and understand where a process stuck, why, etc...
So I have somehow to display the requester only the relevant processes,
Thanks,
Asaf.
Correct...it's often the case that things depend on the requester. Now I come
to think of it... did it once to, but that was between two parties and each had
to be able to see what task was assigned to him OR the other party...
It is an option to e.g. use a compound businesskey like:
anonymous wrote :
| Correct...it's often the case that things depend on the requester.
|
Should have said requirement or usecase
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196689#4196689
Reply to the post :
