Hi All,
I think the problem was that I had to mark the variables to be written back to
the super-process as;
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4268844#4268844
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&
Hi,
I have successfully copied the super-process variables into the sub-process
using the "variable" element in the process definition.
Chapter 18 Table 18.8 of the User Guide states
"variable - specifies how data should be copied from the super process to the
sub process at the start and from
Yes all we pass is ids for the domain model objects, however to have to
pre-define those in a process definition is restrictive and complicates code
updates.
However obviously I will have to live with it, I'm surpirsed not many people
have requested a change.
Thanks for the response!
View the
Well, most likely not everybody (we've not had many requests for this) wants
ALL variables copied automatically. So it is the way it is because it just is.
Don't think that there is a specific reason for it. Other than that maybe many
users use a domain model and have all info in there and just
"Implicit is possible by extending and overriding the subprocess node
implementation."
--
Why are super-process variables not by default copied into the sub-process?
Am I missing something or is this not the behaviour what most people require,
should it not be included as part of Jboss JBPM cor
