Date Posted: Jul 14, 2001 11:11 PM
»
Reply
I'm sending a message
to a queue w/ the following lookup in my session bean. I havn't configured
anything for the descriptors nor know what needs to be done. Any
help much appreciated.--- MySess
Also Scott, I noticed that if I check out the contrib folder without
specifying a tag I get all the sub projects,. If however I use teh
JBoss_2.2.2 tag (which you just indicated was faulty anyhow) I only get the
tomcat sub project. Now speaking of tomcat, I had a problem in using tomcat
3.2.2 in
Hi,
I'm using JBoss 2.2.2 + Tomcat 3.2.2. Is it possible to save the HttpSession
attributes between EAR deployments? The objects I'm storing in the session
are all serializable. However, when an EAR is redeployed the session is
invalidated.
Regards
-Laurens
_
> I've used CMP and BLOBs with JBoss in the past. Declare the bean member
> variable that will hold your BLOB data as a byte[]. This will get mapped
> to the of JAVA_OBJECT. Then check (standard)jaws.xml to see
> that the mapping for this exists. It looks like the mapping below -
> BLOB(2000)
Get your InitialContext, and
TopicConnectionFactory factory =
(TopicConnectionFactory)context.lookup("TopicConnectionFactory");
topicConnection = factory.createTopicConnection();
topicConnection.start();
These names are defined in jbossmq.xml (at the bottom, each is an
InvocationLayer).
T
btw - I'm using BMP, does this change anything
since the docs only talk about CMP for this part of the config?
- Original Message -
From:
G.L. Grobe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 1:18
AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] dbase is acting way
too slow
I've used CMP and BLOBs with JBoss in the past. Declare the bean member variable that
will hold your BLOB data as a byte[]. This will get mapped to the of
JAVA_OBJECT. Then check (standard)jaws.xml to see that the mapping for this exists.
It looks like the mapping below - BLOB(2000) - was
At 02:43 AM 7/14/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Just wait 'till the 6.1 kernel comes out; it's gonna be sweet!
>
>=P
>
>--jason
Un Huh.
Now, does any have the same problem of the JBoss daemon script running, but
the program not actually starting. I am running Red Hat Linux 6.1. I have
chosen not to upgra
The JBoss_2_2_2 tag was incorrectly moved to a patch committed to the 2.2
branch
that has not been released. I have moved it to the correct version so update
your
workspace using JBoss_2_2_2 to see what is in the current release.
- Original Message -
From: "John P. Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Tristan,
Thanks for your help, but I already developed my bean this way. We managed
with Burkhard Vogel to find out what was the error and we discovered that
the version of Oracle I'm using (at least) interprets empty strings as NULL
values.
I don't know if this is a normal behaviour in Or
> huh ...
>
> I belive critisism is good when *and only when* a sugested solution folows
> ... as I se it those who need it, should write it ... the mail service
> module ... do not jive support it now ? ...
You've got this the wrong way round. The mailing list is here now. It works
and it's user
But how does one retrieve the connection factory ?
I didn't find any documentation to setting up the
client.
In Bea Weblogic you can do this:
TopicConnectionFactory factory =
(TopicConnectionFactory) context.lookup("weblogic.jms.ConnectionFactory");
topicConnection = factory.createTopicConnectio
The method name 'getIsModified' is redundant, at least in JavaBean terms,
where the prefix 'is' refers the the getter/accessor of a boolean property.
Why not just use isModified()? The above would result in a property named
'isModified', not 'modified', which basically means the same thing, one i
It looks like JAWS can persist objects via BLOB... but that is just a simple
guess by looking at the standardjaws.xml, it has some lines that look like
this:
java.lang.Object
JAVA_OBJECT
BLOB(2000)
Which would lead me to believe that you could get JAWS to persist to a record
wi
Where are you expecting that it will be bound too? Where is the topic
factory connection that you wish DurableTopicConnFactory to be bound to?
Perhaps you should specify the jndi-name?
--jason
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Scott Bermon wrote:
> Can I create more than one TopicConnectionFactory?
>
> I
> The ideal way is to do all such database modifications thru the ejb
> interface only, but, unfortunately, that is not the case for me. Any inputs
> on problems i might face?
How about, why on earth would you do something like that? What external
thingy is going to delete records and leav
Just wait 'till the 6.1 kernel comes out; it's gonna be sweet!
=P
--jason
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Richard Bottoms wrote:
> > In short, there is no Linux 6.1. There is a RedHat Linux
> >distribution that has a 6.1 version
>
> That's what the RH refers to:
>
> >I'm running RH Linux 6.1.
It is just like sending to any other JMS queue (or topic for that matter).
Lookup the connection factory, lookup the destination (a queue), create a
connection, create a session, create a producer (sender in this case) and
send. If you are in a tx session, then commit, else close everything and
g
18 matches
Mail list logo
