It looks like your ejb config wants to use "DefaultDS" which you have
removed. Either change the dd to use OracleDB or rename
DefaultDS
david jencks
On 2001.12.19 21:57:59 -0500 Alice Ad wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to use Oracle instead of hypersonic/instantdb. This is what i did
> in jbos
It seems we have not taken into account the discrepancy between what things
cost in Europe and the US and what things cost in Australia. For this
reason, the Australia training will likely be a one time event and we are
lowering the price to US$2500 for those who register by January 15, 2002 and
U
Hello,
I want to use Oracle instead of hypersonic/instantdb. This is what i did in jboss.jcml:
1. org.jboss.jdbc.JdbcProvider mbean contains ONLY oracle driver
2. org.jboss.jdbc.HypersonicDatabase mbean and org.jboss.jdbc.XADataSourceLoader mbeans for InstantDN and DefaultDS removed
3. org.jboss.jd
I tried the 3.0alpha from the website with no luck (it couldn't find
language resources that should have been there for jetty). I then
downloaded the jboss-all cvs and tried to get the unjar'd cocoon working
by modifying jetty.xml in the jetty plugin sar. That didn't work.
However, I tried
Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
>
> 1.1//EN" "http://jetty.mortbay.org/configure_1_1.dtd";>
>
>
> YourVirtualHostName
>
>
>
If that does what it seems to imply, having a facility like that is a
sign of a twisted mind. I like it a lot!
-danch
___
Julian Gosnell wrote:
> There was one other way which I saw someone using, but
> it was a real hack. Jetty will read a proprietary
> descriptor for each webapp (?jetty-web.xml?) in which
> you can access it's configuration API. I think someone
> was using this to somehow register a new listener
never mind - had some old httpd processes that were hanging out
--
David Ward wrote:
> I'm having a heck of a time getting Apache/mod_jk on a web server to
> talk to JBoss-2.4.3_Tomcat-3.2.3 on a SEPARATE app server. I've got no
> problem when they're on the same box.
>
> Anybody doing this
about a year I started using jboss, and everytime I posted a question to the
mailing list someone would kindly respond to it. However since the forums
have been up and running there are a less people answering questions. You
can have a look at all the 0 replies. Is is because of the fragmentation
Jetty supports virtual hosts. AFAIK, JBoss' deployment
mechanism currently does not.
You have two choices:
1. The JBoss/Jetty integration preserves Jetty's
proprietary configuration abilities. i.e. you could
configure your webapps to be deployed onto virtual
hosts via the jetty.xml file. The pro
Hi,
I hope I am not too late ...
with jboss-2.2.2 we have absolutely no problem. JBoss does his own
log(console + files) and our ejb too.
All tries to deploy these ejb in jboss-2.4.3 fail due to a problem with
log4j.
After several test and tries...I got the ejb deployed (I've changed the line
'lo
10 matches
Mail list logo
