Re: [JBoss-user] CommunicationException: Peek timed out

2002-11-23 Thread G.L. Grobe
 If you mean the line run by theRMIAdapter lookup ... yes. String adaptorName = "jmx:" + props.getProperty("fielder.manager") + ":rmi"; Which results in"jmx:myServer:rmi".I can ping and telnet to 'myServer' where jboss is running just fine. This is driving me nuts. As always, any help

RE: [JBoss-user] Locking and Readonly Beans

2002-11-23 Thread Sacha Labourey
Which isloation level do you use in your DB? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Jon Swinth Envoyé : vendredi, 22 novembre 2002 18:56 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [JBoss-user] Locking and Readonly Beans We have been having some

Re: [JBoss-user] CMR Performance: Weblogic7 Much Faster Then JBoss

2002-11-23 Thread Stephen Coy
This change is now in Branch_3_2. It looks a little like 3.2 has acquired some other baggage though - our benchmark for 2000 beans is a little slower than it was under 3.0.4: 23:06:47,044 INFO [STDOUT] creating 2000 Blobs... 23:07:30,811 INFO [STDOUT] Creation complete, took 43764ms.

[JBoss-user] Re: Locking and Readonly Beans

2002-11-23 Thread Jon Swinth
The isolation level is READ COMMITED. From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Locking and Readonly Beans Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:06:11 +0100 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which isloation level do you use in your DB? -Message

RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss vs. JRun 4

2002-11-23 Thread James Higginbotham
Hi, Well, I haven't used Jrun in a few years, but I know that they are almost always behind on the specs. And since its not open source, you don't have a clue what's going on inside the server when something gets screwy. Take it from someone who used to be a big Weblogic fan (back to 4.x and even

RE: [JBoss-user] log4j and jboss: where is log4j.properties?

2002-11-23 Thread saroj kumar
Hi, You can configure your log4j.xml in JBOSS_HOME\conf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of linuxman Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 9:40 PM To: jboss ml Subject: [JBoss-user] log4j and jboss: where is log4j.properties? hi, I want to

[JBoss-user] log4j and jboss: where is log4j.properties?

2002-11-23 Thread linuxman
hi, I want to use apache log4j in my jboss j2ee application, but where should I put log4j.properties? which directory? thanks in advance! linuxman --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.

Re: [JBoss-user] CMR Performance: Weblogic7 Much Faster Then JBoss

2002-11-23 Thread Dain
Can you try 4.0? -dain On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 06:34 AM, Stephen Coy wrote: This change is now in Branch_3_2. It looks a little like 3.2 has acquired some other baggage though - our benchmark for 2000 beans is a little slower than it was under 3.0.4: 23:06:47,044 INFO [STDOUT]

Re: [JBoss-user] Encryption of configuration files

2002-11-23 Thread Scott M Stark
You can always store a secure hash of the password in the config file provided that it can be used in the hashed form. If a context needs to see the clear text form of the password then you would have to store an encrypted form of the password and decrypt it by providing a wrapper of the mbean

Re: [JBoss-user] log4j and jboss: where is log4j.properties?

2002-11-23 Thread linuxman
Thanks first! Yes, I noticed that in $JBOSS_HOME/server/default/conf, there is log4j.xml, then you mean, I can use this default properties for my jboss application deployed in $JBOSS_HOME/server/default/deploy? But my test application run correctly, just say nothing:-), not log to

Re: [JBoss-user] Problems with scoping classes for .ear

2002-11-23 Thread Scott M Stark
Read the release notes for 3.2 that describe how to submit a bug or at least a trace of the class loading behavior. http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=13 Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC -

Re: [JBoss-user] JNDI over HTTP problem

2002-11-23 Thread Scott M Stark
The Context.PROVIDER_URL tells where to obtain the JNDI proxy via http. The transport layer of the proxy is configured by the invokerServletPath property set in the conf/jboss-service.xml descriptor. This defaults to invokerServletPath=http://localhost:8080/invoker/JMXInvokerServlet This must

[JBoss-user] 2.4 Connection pools

2002-11-23 Thread Guy Rouillier
David, sorry I'm not following what you are saying below. I just extracted the latest from Branch_2_4 last night, 11/23/2002, and the XA implementation is what I submitted about 6 months ago. I don't see any changes there. Please explain where you replaced the connection pool. What I'm talking

Re: [JBoss-user] 2.4 Connection pools

2002-11-23 Thread David Jencks
I took another look, apparently the xa stuff works if you are using the jboss fake xa wrapper and not otherwise (look at XAConnectionFactory.checkValidObject). So, sure, go ahead with the jdbc. If you want to make the xa work for non-wrapped xa datasources that would be fine also. david jencks

Re: [JBoss-user] Encryption of configuration files

2002-11-23 Thread danch
But if you do elect to encrypt, remember that the security you have is only as good as the security of the key - unless you go to considerable effort, you'll not provide any better security than having the cleartext in the config file in the first place. I'd be suspect of a service that allows