If you mean the line run by theRMIAdapter lookup ...
yes.
String adaptorName = "jmx:" +
props.getProperty("fielder.manager") + ":rmi";
Which results
in"jmx:myServer:rmi".I can ping and telnet to 'myServer' where jboss
is running just fine.
This is driving me nuts. As always,
any help
Which isloation level do you use in your DB?
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Jon Swinth
Envoyé : vendredi, 22 novembre 2002 18:56
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-user] Locking and Readonly Beans
We have been having some
This change is now in Branch_3_2.
It looks a little like 3.2 has acquired some other baggage though - our
benchmark for 2000 beans is a little slower
than it was under 3.0.4:
23:06:47,044 INFO [STDOUT] creating 2000 Blobs...
23:07:30,811 INFO [STDOUT] Creation complete, took 43764ms.
The isolation level is READ COMMITED.
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Locking and Readonly Beans
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:06:11 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which isloation level do you use in your DB?
-Message
Hi,
Well, I haven't used Jrun in a few years, but I know that they are
almost always behind on the specs. And since its not open source, you
don't have a clue what's going on inside the server when something gets
screwy. Take it from someone who used to be a big Weblogic fan (back to
4.x and even
Hi,
You can configure your log4j.xml in JBOSS_HOME\conf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of linuxman
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 9:40 PM
To: jboss ml
Subject: [JBoss-user] log4j and jboss: where is log4j.properties?
hi,
I want to
hi,
I want to use apache log4j in my jboss j2ee application, but where
should I put log4j.properties? which directory?
thanks in advance!
linuxman
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Can you try 4.0?
-dain
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 06:34 AM, Stephen Coy wrote:
This change is now in Branch_3_2.
It looks a little like 3.2 has acquired some other baggage though -
our benchmark for 2000 beans is a little slower
than it was under 3.0.4:
23:06:47,044 INFO [STDOUT]
You can always store a secure hash of the password in the config file provided
that it can be used in the hashed form. If a context needs to see the clear text
form of the password then you would have to store an encrypted form of the
password and decrypt it by providing a wrapper of the mbean
Thanks first!
Yes, I noticed that in $JBOSS_HOME/server/default/conf, there is
log4j.xml, then you mean, I can use this default properties for my jboss
application deployed in $JBOSS_HOME/server/default/deploy?
But my test application run correctly, just say nothing:-), not log to
Read the release notes for 3.2 that describe how to submit a bug or at least a trace
of the class loading behavior.
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=13
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-
The Context.PROVIDER_URL tells where to obtain the JNDI proxy via
http. The transport layer of the proxy is configured by the invokerServletPath
property set in the conf/jboss-service.xml descriptor. This defaults to
invokerServletPath=http://localhost:8080/invoker/JMXInvokerServlet
This must
David, sorry I'm not following what you are saying below. I just extracted
the latest from Branch_2_4 last night, 11/23/2002, and the XA implementation
is what I submitted about 6 months ago. I don't see any changes there.
Please explain where you replaced the connection pool. What I'm talking
I took another look, apparently the xa stuff works if you are using the
jboss fake xa wrapper and not otherwise (look at
XAConnectionFactory.checkValidObject).
So, sure, go ahead with the jdbc. If you want to make the xa work for
non-wrapped xa datasources that would be fine also.
david jencks
But if you do elect to encrypt, remember that the security you have is
only as good as the security of the key - unless you go to
considerable effort, you'll not provide any better security than
having the cleartext in the config file in the first place.
I'd be suspect of a service that allows
15 matches
Mail list logo