Jos, thank you for your answers. I downloaded 1.2b3 and now I can deploy
automatically.
Cheerse,
Marco
- Original Message -
From: Jos Visser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marco Tedone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss
You could always move to WebSphere. I've seen that take upwards
of an hour to deploy things! :-)
--
Danny Yates
-Original Message-
From: Peng Zhao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 June 2003 22:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Developing and debuging
I met a big
Hi,
I'm using Jboss3.0 and I need to integrate SOAP.
I have done my program simply using and configuring Tomcat, without
running JBoss.
What should I do with mail.jar, activation.jar, xerces.jar and soap.jar to
make SOAP works inside Jboss ?
Thanks in advanced.
--
I've the experience of working in a large scale intranet system and a middleware
system both running in JBoss. They both are functioning smoothly. The Intranet system
is for a huge Financial Institution and is being used extensively by minumum of 100
users concurrently. JBoss is just simply
You could always move to WebSphere. I've seen that take upwards
of an hour to deploy things! :-)
--
Danny Yates
Or you could go back to the good old days, when Tomcat was in a separate
VM and you either coded in a deployment kicker or stopped, deleted the WAR
and restarted Tomcat.
I also
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] EJB reference to external EJB
Thanks for your replies Scott and Dan.
My understanding of what is being said...
I have an EJB 1 in EAR A that wants to reference EJB 2 in EAR B where both EARs are deployed in the same VM. According to the EJB spec, l cant use local
Title: Message
Seems
pretty straight to me.
--
Danny Yates
-Original Message-From: Burns, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003
10:48To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[JBoss-user] EJB reference to external EJB
Thanks for your replies Scott and Dan.
JBoss still uses the remote interfaces of ejb 2 (that is what you ask for)
but the invocation has local interface semantics since, inside the vm,
objects are not copied by jboss on a call through the remote interfaces.
david jencks
On 2003.06.18 05:47 Burns, Jamie wrote:
Thanks for your
Hi Gurus,
The application currently I am working is having only Remote Interfaces.
But there are scenarios, like the client never invoked the entity bean
directly. Only the session bean invokes the entity bean. The client invokes
the stateless session beans.
In such a scenario, does the
I've been trying to package up some libraries required by my EJB (MDB
actually) into my MDB's jar file and make a Class-Path entry in the
MANIFEST.MF to put those libraries into the classloader associated with
this EJB only.
My package (MyMDB.jar) basically looks like this:
MyMDB.class
Using the local interface bypasses the need to use a PortableRemoteObject,
which can be quite expensive.
So the coding for local use is:
Object ref = naming.lookup(DefinitionManagerLocal);
DefinitionManagerLocalHome home = (DefinitionManagerLocalHome)ref;
DefinitionManagerLocal definitionManager
Hi guys,
We have an .ear file which contains a few properties files from which the system gets
initialized. Since this properties files should be configurable, we thought of moving
those configurable properties files away from the ear file. (like how log4j.xml is in
conf folder)
Which is the
Can anyone tell me the meaning of this messages?
[...]
17:04:38,714 WARN [AbstractInstanceCache] Unable to passivate due to
ctx lock, id=[.4228.]
17:04:39,020 WARN [AbstractInstanceCache] Unable to passivate due to
ctx lock, id=[.46.]
17:04:39,727 WARN [AbstractInstanceCache] Unable to
The instances are locked and can't be passivated (evicted from the
cache). Could you provide deployment info on the entities that can't be
passivated?
Specifically, do you have foreign keys mapped to CMP fields?
alex
Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 6:13:39 PM, Davide Pozza wrote:
DP Can anyone tell
Hi, I'm interested in webservices in Jboss and
particularly juddi integration in Jboss, that's why i would like tobuild
the jboss 4.0 branch from cvs. Is it posible? or even, can i build only the
jboss.net contrib?
greets
Alberto Rodriguez Galdo wrote:
Hi, I'm interested in webservices in Jboss and particularly juddi
integration in Jboss, that's why i would like to build the jboss 4.0
branch from cvs. Is it posible? or even, can i build only the jboss.net
contrib?
greets
Yeap. You can follow intructions on
I'm interested in building Jboss 4.0 from cvs, this
cames from my interest in taking a look at how juddi integration is going Is
posible to build the 4.0 branch, particularly the juddi and webservicies part
(jbbos-net)part?
Hi,
we're starting JBoss remotely on another machine to which we are connected
via an ISDN line. Problem is, when we cut the ISDN connection to the remote
machine, JBoss immediately shuts itself down if there are no other users
using JBoss on the remote machine. What does cause the shutdown?
Hi David,
After reading your and Scotts replies I've packaged the mbean classes
and -service.xml into a .sar to try to get the classes loaded.
I have a problem that both my mbean .sar and my ejb .jar both need to
use the EJB interfaces, so I've packaged the interfaces into both the
.sar and the
Meyer-Willner, Bernhard wrote:
Hi,
we're starting JBoss remotely on another machine to which we are connected
via an ISDN line. Problem is, when we cut the ISDN connection to the remote
machine, JBoss immediately shuts itself down if there are no other users
using JBoss on the remote machine.
Title:
158
With the new 2.0 CMP specifications, whenever possible local interfaces are
suggested. In your (and many other) cases, a session bean facade (that is
hiding from client the entity bean, but managing it through a session bean)
it is the right things to do. The main advantage from local interfaces
cvs
checkout jboss-head
www.sourceforge.net on how to anonymously
attach to cvs.
Bill
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Alberto
Rodriguez GaldoSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:30
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Thanks everybody for providing your testimonials! Could you possibly do me
a favor and repost on the Testimonial Forum if you haven't already?
http://www.jboss.org/forum.jsp?forum=159
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group, LLC
Cast your vote
On Unix the typical behavior is for child processes to die (get a HUP signal)
when the parent shell process dies. That is when the shell is closed either
explicitely or because the connection is terminated.
You can get around that by using the 'nohup' command as in:
nohup your_command
(That
Using 3.0.7, I have two entity beans with a 1-to-many relationship
defined. Using CMP CMR. This is not a parent-child relationship, so
there is no cascade set up.
Let's call them Car and Color. A Car has a Color. A Color may be
related to several Cars.
If I try and delete a Color that some
When you make the COLOR_ID non null, then you are making the constraint
mandatory inside the database, but the EJB specification does not have such
a notion. When you remove the Color, the CMP nulls out the relationship in
memory (as it should), but the constraint prevents this being persisted.
I'm trying to deploy Apache OJB in Jboss 3.2.0 as ojb.sar, with two MBeans
defined in jboss-service.xml.
This packaging structure worked fine in Jboss 3.0.6, but in 3.2 lots of
exceptions are thrown at init, followed by the depends on me message shown
below. The root problem appears to be the
Hi,
The changes to the way the transaction manager is
deployed have highlighted this problem.
The root problem is that an ejb shouldn't be
deployed until its declared invokers have started.
There are a number of possible workarounds:
1) Make the EJB Deployer depend upon the invoker
(no ejbs
Either will work, as would creating a system configuration mbean
so that you could edit the attributes dynamically.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Magesh Prabhu wrote:
Hi guys,
We have an .ear file which contains a few
The UserTransaction interface is supposed to be bound under
java:comp/UserTransaction for the j2ee components so I'll
look into what regressed.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
Evidently, changing
There is no default timeout so 4 secs is something about the env
you are running in. The jnp.timeout controls the intial connect
timeout and the jnp.sotimeout controls the read timeout on the
socket.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Title:
33 matches
Mail list logo
