| {
| logger.warn(fe.getMessage());
| }
| catch (NamingException ne)
| {
| logger.warn(ne.getMessage(),ne);
| }
| }
| return retval;
| }
|
Thanks for the help
jchang
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb
one will have a primary key that doesn't exist
anymore in the database.
There has to be a way to avoid this confrontation between these two beans.
How come the second thread is being allow to execute the findBy... method in the first
place?
Thanks in advance,
jchang
P.S. Please let me
STATELESS session bean to be transaction type "Required" and NOT
read only.
I thought that if a method is not read-only then only one thread can execute at one
time (Transaction locking).
How can I accomplish that?
Thanks in advance,
jchang
By the way, I am using JBoss 3.2.1 and EJB
method that calls
these finders in the STATELESS session bean to be transaction type "Required" and NOT
read only.
I thought that if a method is not read-only then only one thread can execute at one
time (Transaction locking).
How can I accomplish that?
Thanks in advance,
jchang
By
By the way I am using Jboss 3.2.1 and JMeter as the testing tool
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829859#3829859
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3829859
---
entity bean. but I have not code that could delete this entity.
Also, why would it say that Store command Not executed. Entity is not dirty.
Thanks in advance for your help
jchang
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829856#3829856
Repl
saction. In other
words, Does JBoss creates a transaction when a private method is use in a session bean.
I apologize in advance if any of these question doesn't make sense.
Thanks for the help
jchang
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&
