Could you add a Wiki page with that ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3956508#3956508
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3956508
I added a link on the Wiki to the blog entry under a new heading - Components.
Would you prefer a copy of the entry?
I've also added a JasperReports component that compiles (at the time Seam
starts) reports designs defined in components.xml and makes them available for
injection.
View the
This is great like this. thanks for sharing your components !
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3956622#3956622
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3956622
Nice. It might be worth including this in Seam.
Can commons-email also be used for processing incoming emails? If so, could get
something decent be combining this with JCA message inflow mapped to a
message-driven bean.
View the original post :
Do we have a component registry? It might be interesting to start collecting
some of these to give seam developers more tools to choose from.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3956660#3956660
Reply to the post :
No it can only send email.
When I wrote this I started off with the JavaMail API (which jboss has an impl
of) which CAN be used to receive email but changed to commons email (which is
build on JavaMail API) as it presented an easier to use interface. And I have
no need to receive emails ;)
I
The whole area of processing email is an important one that I wanted to get
sorted out, but it just keeps getting pushed and pushed...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3956670#3956670
Reply to the post :
I think it is great to have a component for email manipulation, but IMHO this
concern is orthogonal to that of a web framework. Including something like this
in the Seam standard would add unnecesary complexity to the framework and its
documentation. Again, IM(Very)HO, I see a place for a
