Re: [JBoss-user] 3.2.2 Connection Pool problem

2003-10-27 Thread Andrew May
This has been fixed. You should also notice that this performs better in 3.2.3RC1 compared with 3.2.1 if you always do readonly on the connection. ReadOnly is now set lazily, so it will only pass the request to the db the first time. After that it will remain as readonly until you don't

Re: [JBoss-user] 3.2.2 Connection Pool problem

2003-10-27 Thread Adrian Brock
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 09:58, Andrew May wrote: This has been fixed. You should also notice that this performs better in 3.2.3RC1 compared with 3.2.1 if you always do readonly on the connection. ReadOnly is now set lazily, so it will only pass the request to the db the first time.

Re: [JBoss-user] 3.2.2 Connection Pool problem

2003-10-27 Thread Andrew May
This is the diff (fairly trivial): http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosscx/src/main/org/jboss/resource/adapter/jdbc/WrappedConnection.jpp?r1=1.1.2.8r2=1.1.2.9 Thanks, that does the trick. Once again I can search obscure bibliographic databases :) -Andrew

Re: [JBoss-user] 3.2.2 Connection Pool problem

2003-10-24 Thread Adrian Brock
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 10:46, Andrew May wrote: Hi, We've just upgraded to 3.2.2 from 3.2.1 and we're having a problem with one our JDBC connection pools. We're using a BASIS bibliographic database that only allows you to query the database if the JDBC connection is read-only. After we

[JBoss-user] 3.2.2 Connection Pool problem

2003-10-22 Thread Andrew May
Hi, We've just upgraded to 3.2.2 from 3.2.1 and we're having a problem with one our JDBC connection pools. We're using a BASIS bibliographic database that only allows you to query the database if the JDBC connection is read-only. After we get a connection from a Datasource we're calling

Re: [JBoss-user] 3.2.2 Connection Pool problem

2003-10-22 Thread Scott M Stark
Possibly. Open a bug report on sourceforge with the code fragment that is no longer working. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Andrew May wrote: Hi, We've just upgraded to 3.2.2 from 3.2.1 and we're having a problem with