Re: [JBoss-user] Official position of the JBoss Group (or CDN) onthe LGPL?

2003-07-21 Thread Ionel Gardais
Hi, I understand it as : you can use LGPL'd code in your own products and ask license fees the way you want for your product. However, the LGPL'd part of your softwares remains under LGPL and cannot be charged of any fees. That is, your licence cost is only for the non-LGPL part of your

Re: [JBoss-user] Official position of the JBoss Group (or CDN) onthe LGPL?

2003-07-21 Thread Ionel Gardais
Can't tell. I have just presumptions. And you need more than presumptions :) cu, ionel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux /

Re: [JBoss-user] Official position of the JBoss Group (or CDN) onthe LGPL?

2003-07-18 Thread Scott M Stark
Legal decisions are for lawyers. That being said the update at the start of the comment on the indicated link seems clear: quote Update: 07/18 02:44 GMT by CN: The FSF's Executive Director, Brad Kuhn adds LGPL's S. 6 allows you to make new works that link with the LGPL'ed code, and license

Re: [JBoss-user] Official position of the JBoss Group (or CDN) onthe LGPL?

2003-07-18 Thread Scott M Stark
If you want certainly talk to your licensing lawyer. Ours will cost you at least $250/hr + minimum. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Kevin Duffey wrote: That said, I want to be sure I understand that this means I could