through access attributes such as PRIVATE or
PROTECTED.
-Original Message-
From: fractals [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
I don't think of an interface as a &qu
> hi,
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, fractals wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a
remote
> > interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I
define
> > for some of my beans.
> >
> > Really, is there no way to get this cornerstone of OO p
hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, fractals wrote:
> AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a remote
> interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I define
> for some of my beans.
>
> Really, is there no way to get this cornerstone of OO programming back
l Message -
>From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 8:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
>
>
> > Interesting this topic should come up now. I'v
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
> Interesting this topic should come up now. I've been wondering why EJBs
are
> not defined as implementing their remote interf
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
> Interesting this topic should come up now. I've bee
ctals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
> I don't think of an interface as a "pattern specifically about the
publicly
> available views/facets of an object
>I don't think of an interface as a "pattern specifically about the publicly
>available views/facets of an object". You can define interfaces that are
>visible only from the package, and in fact, this is a feature that I use
>often in my designs. In my opinion, interfaces are a means for
>specifi
method should be available to some you have
> this path as well.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "fractals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:37 PM
> Subject: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming
t: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:37 PM
Subject: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
> AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a remote
> interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I define
> for some of my beans.
If it's not public, why is it in the interface?
fractals wrote:
>
> AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a remote
> interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I define
> for some of my beans.
>
> Really, is there no way to get this cornerst
AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a remote
interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I define
for some of my beans.
Really, is there no way to get this cornerstone of OO programming back into
the EJB realm ?
Thanks,
candide
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
