through access attributes such as PRIVATE or
PROTECTED.
-Original Message-
From: fractals [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
I don't think of an interface as a &qu
> hi,
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, fractals wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a
remote
> > interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I
define
> > for some of my beans.
> >
> > Really, is there no way to get this cornerstone of OO p
hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, fractals wrote:
> AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a remote
> interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I define
> for some of my beans.
>
> Really, is there no way to get this cornerstone of OO programming back
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
> Interesting this topic should come up now. I've bee
ctals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] access modifiers lost in EJB programming ?
> I don't think of an interface as a "pattern specifically about the
publicly
> available views/facets of an object
>I don't think of an interface as a "pattern specifically about the publicly
>available views/facets of an object". You can define interfaces that are
>visible only from the package, and in fact, this is a feature that I use
>often in my designs. In my opinion, interfaces are a means for
>specifi
I don't think of an interface as a "pattern specifically about the publicly
available views/facets of an object". You can define interfaces that are
visible only from the package, and in fact, this is a feature that I use
often in my designs. In my opinion, interfaces are a means for
specification
There is no way to define anything but public method in any interface. This
is not limited to remote interfaces or EJB. Interfaces are an OO pattern specifically
about the publicly available views/facets of an object. If you want to hide
some method of an EJB implementation then don't put the meth
If it's not public, why is it in the interface?
fractals wrote:
>
> AFAIK, there's no way to make a method anything else than public in a remote
> interface. Sad, because I *would* like to hide some of the methods I define
> for some of my beans.
>
> Really, is there no way to get this cornerst
