Peter Antman wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Toby Allsopp wrote:
>> Are you aware of the JSR for JCA 2.0, which adds asynchronous stuff? It
>> also explicitly mentions JMS.
>
> I was not up until to yesterday, when one of the OpenEJB guys told me
> about it. But I already know that the next versio
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Toby Allsopp wrote:
> Peter Antman wrote:
>
> > Well, that was just a few imressions from the conference. And by the way,
> > I have started writing a J2EE Connector JMS resource adapter, which will
> > bring JMS as a true resource (transacted) to JBoss also for publishing
>
Thanks for the report,
I am glad JBoss was mentionned everywhere, we *are* the open source leading
group in J2EE, and buzz makes us feel all warm.
I will just say this...
I had to cancel because I am working on the training, I am broke (post
Telkel), and I am going to JavaONE and I pay one tick
|> - Local interfaces added for possible cal by reference semantic between
|> beens in the same...well ear-file I think. Makes entity beans possible to
|> use in a fine grained fasion, behind an entity or session facade wich
|> calles them throug the container but with normal java local call
|sema
Peter Antman wrote:
> Well, that was just a few imressions from the conference. And by the way,
> I have started writing a J2EE Connector JMS resource adapter, which will
> bring JMS as a true resource (transacted) to JBoss also for publishing
> and not only (as now) for message driven beasn;-)
> so the last day of the Oreilly Java Enterprise Conference has past. Yes, I
> was there, and I really heard a LOT of people talking about, mention,
> referencing, planing to test JBoss. Thats nice, but a shame that no one
> from the JBoss team showed up, instead the open source part of the
> conf