maven contribution

2004-09-24 Thread Dominik Dahlem
Hi all, I'm curious to know whether there are plans to add jde-maven.el under the hood of JDEE? There are two versions of jde-maven.el around [1,2] but they have not been contributed to the JDE CVS. Thanks, Dominik [1]-http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-emacs-sources/2004-05/msg00032.html

problem generating javadoc

2004-09-24 Thread Dominik Dahlem
Hi all, I've installed JDEE 2.3.4beta5 with cedet-1.0beta3b for XEmacs 21.4 and I'm experiencing a problem when I type M-x jde-javadoc-checkdoc. The error message in the minibuffer reads Symbol's value as variable is void: semantic-tfe-overlay. Since I'm not a lisp expert I appreciate every

Re: problem generating javadoc

2004-09-24 Thread Dominik Dahlem
Here is the stacktrace... Signaling: (void-variable semantic-tfe-overlay) jde-javadoc-token-access-level((MobileContainer type (:typemodifiers (public) :interfaces (Container) :members (... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...) :type class) (link-hook

RE: maven contribution

2004-09-24 Thread Nascif Abousalh-Neto
That would be a nice extension to JDE. Would it be possible to extend the Ant Server or the Compile Server to make them generic enough to run Maven, or other Java-based tools like PMD, CheckStyle, etc., etc? I found that the code in AntServer.java and CompileServer.java is very similar; the

RE: maven contribution

2004-09-24 Thread Paul Kinnucan
Nascif Abousalh-Neto writes: That would be a nice extension to JDE. Would it be possible to extend the Ant Server or the Compile Server to make them generic enough to run Maven, or other Java-based tools like PMD, CheckStyle, etc., etc? I found that the code in AntServer.java and

problems with method completion

2004-09-24 Thread Raul Acevedo
Method completion (jde-complete-menu) has worked for me like a charm in the past. As of recently, it always gives me No completion. Which is weird, because it can complete member variable names, even if the variable is defined in the parent class... but when it comes to completing methods on