Re: Compiler window deletion - UI question/suggestion

2005-04-06 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 14:24 -0700, Jeff Peck wrote: If everyone else only expects one window per frame, and really wants to close the second/temporary compile output window, then maybe we should make creative use of save-window-excursion, to restore the configuration? That's what I do.

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JDEE 2.3.5 available at ...

2004-12-17 Thread Raul Acevedo
I'm sure you mean sourceforget.net right? :) On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 19:30 +, Matthew Kurjanowicz wrote: It may also be nice (if its possible/allowed) to mirror this in a project at slashdot. I like sunsite.dk and am very appreciative, but if they don't want to host multiple versions then

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JDEE 2.3.5 available at ...

2004-12-17 Thread Raul Acevedo
Message- From: Raul Acevedo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:24 PM To: Paul Kinnucan Cc: Britton, Chris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JDEE 2.3.5 available at ... Actually, it would be nice if the download file were called jde-2.3.5.zip

Re: Java Buffer modified on reading

2004-11-22 Thread Raul Acevedo
I don't know when this started happening, but I have noticed that loading any Java buffer creates lots of Wrong type argument: integer-or-marker-p, nil errors in the *Messages* buffer. While that doesn't halt loading of the buffer for me (which is what leaves the buffer marked modified), I

jde and emacs memory usage

2004-11-18 Thread Raul Acevedo
Right now my Emacs process is using 127 Megs of memory. While the *jde-beanshell-scratch* buffer size is 1239491, and another buffer I have is also just over 1 Meg, the total sum of all my buffers is still only a few megabytes, I definitely am not consuming anywhere near 100 megabytes in buffers.

Re: jde and emacs memory usage

2004-11-18 Thread Raul Acevedo
it will create the buffer if it does not exist. Suraj On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:53:11 -0800, Raul Acevedo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right now my Emacs process is using 127 Megs of memory. While the *jde-beanshell-scratch* buffer size is 1239491, and another buffer I have is also just over 1 Meg

Re: [jde] [ANNOUNCEMENT] JDEE 2.3.4beta6 available at ...

2004-10-13 Thread Raul Acevedo
Sounds fantastic, Paul. Thank you!!! Raul On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 01:14 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote: http://jdee.sunsite.dk/rootpage.html#Downloading JDE 2.3.4beta6 *** * PLEASE READ

Re: [jde] [ANNOUNCEMENT] JDEE 2.3.4beta6 available at ...

2004-10-13 Thread Raul Acevedo
The tar file download has permissions of [76]00 for all files and directories, meaning only root can access them (if you untar/install as root). I had to chmod everything to make it world readable. Raul On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 01:14 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote:

Re: [jde] jde-usages and jde-2.3.4beta6 do not play nicely together

2004-10-13 Thread Raul Acevedo
Same problems if process-connection-type is t. (I did note that it's used in a macro and rebuilt all the .elc files before trying.) Raul On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 15:14 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote: Raul Acevedo writes: The jde-usages plugin doesn't like the new JDEE beta 6. It's hard

Re: [jde] Re: [jde] problems finding symbol definition if class implements interface

2004-10-10 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 00:32 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote: Raul Acevedo writes: Looking at the JDEE source, it looks like it just doesn't know about symbols in interfaces at all. In particular, jde-open-jump-to-class only knows to look in the parent class, but it doesn't consider any

Re: [jde] problems finding symbol definition if class implements interface

2004-10-08 Thread Raul Acevedo
limitation? Raul On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 15:49 -0700, Raul Acevedo wrote: I have something like: public interface FooInterface { public static final int FOO = 1; } public class FooClass implements FooInterface { public void doSomething() { System.out.println(I'm doing

problems finding symbol definition if class implements interface

2004-10-07 Thread Raul Acevedo
I have something like: public interface FooInterface { public static final int FOO = 1; } public class FooClass implements FooInterface { public void doSomething() { System.out.println(I'm doing something with + FOO); } } If I put the cursor on the System.out.println, on

Re: debugging with jdb

2004-10-07 Thread Raul Acevedo
Would the problem be solved if comint returned code 1, instead of 129? In other words, is the problem that comint returns an inappropriate error code, or that comint returns *any* error code at all (i.e. it shouldn't get an error from the subprocess in the first place)? Raul On Fri, 2004-10-08

debugging with jdb

2004-10-05 Thread Raul Acevedo
I haven't debugged with JDE in a while, so I don't know if this is a new bug with the latest JDEE beta. Every time I display an expression with jdb, the debugger exits. Is this a known issue? It will display the expression just fine, and then exit with Comint exited abnormally with code 129.

Re: debugging with jdb

2004-10-05 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 15:18 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote: No this is a problem with Comint on some combinations of Emacs and the host operating system. I believe it may have something to do with how comint handles standard error input from an external process, e.g., jdb. It's my impression that

Re: refactoring in jdee

2004-09-30 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 13:50 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote: My plan originally was to use xref as a basis for factoring commands. Now it appears that jde-usages might be a better basis. I need input on what kind of factoring commands users want. I think just being able to refactor variable and

Re: [jde] Re: refactoring in jdee

2004-09-30 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 13:58 -0400, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote: The ability to change class names as well would be awesome :) Yes, that would be cool also. In terms of priority, I'd rather see variable and method refactoring first, since that's a bit more common. With jde-usages in place, adding

Re: refactoring in jdee

2004-09-30 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 12:01 -0600, m0smith wrote: Also, extracting a method woutld be very useful. Good lord that sounds like dental work. :) What exactly is method extraction? Raul

how to get semantic to shut up

2004-09-29 Thread Raul Acevedo
How do I get semantic to shut up? It has a really, really annoying habit of constantly filling the minibuffer with annoying messages like incremental parser error and Variables: foo bar and who knows what other nonsense. I really couldn't care less. Is there some global setting to tell it to

refactoring in jdee

2004-09-29 Thread Raul Acevedo
I know this question comes up at least once a year. I figure it's about time to ask again, in case new tools have come up. How do you do refactoring in Emacs/JDEE? Are there plans to include refactoring into JDEE at some point? Raul

Re: how to get semantic to shut up

2004-09-29 Thread Raul Acevedo
Thanks! On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 20:46 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:39:54 -0700, Raul Acevedo wrote: How do I get semantic to shut up? It has a really, really annoying habit of constantly filling the minibuffer with annoying messages like incremental parser error

Re: how to get semantic to shut up

2004-09-29 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 20:46 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the old debug messages in semantic are gone. The incremental parser error sounds like a bug that needs some reproduction steps so it can be fixed. The Variables: ... sounds like `semantic-idle-summary-mode'. If you don't

Re: how to get semantic to shut up

2004-09-29 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like there's no easy way to disable these, short of either completely disabling the semantic incremental parser or of redefining working-temp-message to be a no-op. Is there a major disadvantage to doing either of those?

Re: [jde] xref *-caller files empty

2004-09-28 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:15 +0100, Dominik Dahlem wrote: I'm testing the xref functionality on a small codebase. In my most simple example, I would like to display the call tree of a private method in a class. Also, jde-xref-first-caller results in a message No more calls in my minibuffer.

jde and jsp development using mmm-mode

2004-09-27 Thread Raul Acevedo
I'm trying to use mmm-mode for the first time, and it doesn't work very well. Fontification is screwed up... the HTML sections are not fontified correctly, and the JSP sections are always fontified using mmm-default-submode-face, not the faces specified in mmm-sample.el. Apparently there's a

problems with method completion

2004-09-24 Thread Raul Acevedo
Method completion (jde-complete-menu) has worked for me like a charm in the past. As of recently, it always gives me No completion. Which is weird, because it can complete member variable names, even if the variable is defined in the parent class... but when it comes to completing methods on

Re: [jde] Re: Usages plugin problem with deleted classes

2004-09-23 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 16:04 -0700, Suraj Acharya wrote: Was bsh running when you renamed the class? Someone else renamed the class, I simply synchronized my code base. I have since restarted Emacs several times. If the .class file is not in the classpath then getting rid of the files in

Re: [jde] Color coding only on first java file

2004-09-22 Thread Raul Acevedo
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 23:06 -0400, Paul Kinnucan wrote: There seems to be a bug in semantic that is cured by putting the following in your .emacs file: (setq semantic-load-turn-useful-things-on t) See Jeff Greif's post to the JDEE mailing list earlier today. Is it necessary to restart

Usages plugin problem with deleted classes

2004-09-22 Thread Raul Acevedo
I'm using the usages plugin, and it's awesome. One problem: a class that got deleted (actually renamed to a different package) a few days ago is confusing it when I lookup subclasses; it somehow finds a reference to the old class, but since it's not compiled and the source is not around, it

problems with jde-java-font-lock-constant-face

2004-09-09 Thread Raul Acevedo
JDEE beta 5 doesn't consistently fontify constants such as FOO_BAR. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't, if I edit the buffer, it will suddenly fontify properly, but if I reload the file the proper fontification will go away. For example, if I start up emacs without my init

Re: Jde Xref problem

2004-08-17 Thread Raul Acevedo
I submitted a patch to fix this... I believe it is in the latest beta of JDE (2.3.4beta5). Raul On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Ping Liang wrote: When using the jde-xref feature, I have experienced a problem. Syndrome: After jde-xref-make-xref-db, I moved the cursor to a method in one of my classes

[jde] problems compiling jde beta 5

2004-07-06 Thread Raul Acevedo
I'm using the makefile, with GNU Emacs 21.3.1, on Red Hat 9. I'm including the full build output below. Raul # make test -d ../../cedet-1.0beta2b -a -d ../../elib rm -f *.elc jde-compile-script-init echo (add-to-list 'load-path \.\) jde-compile-script-init echo (add-to-list 'load-path

problems compiling jde beta 5

2004-07-01 Thread Raul Acevedo
I'm using cedet-1.0beta2b Raul Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function semantic-alias-obsolete) semantic-alias-obsolete(semantic-auto-parse-mode semantic-idle-scheduler-mode)

Re: printing visual diffs?

2004-06-02 Thread Raul Acevedo
if you can print the side by side diffs though. Suraj On Fri, 28 May 2004 11:42:40 -0700, Raul Acevedo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chitale, Sandip V wrote: [I know you are asking about printing...] Are you ware of ediff (emacs package) which lets you view diffs side

[jde] RE: JDE 2.3.4beta3: strange overlining

2004-05-11 Thread Raul Acevedo
Thomas Haselberger wrote: I'm getting the weird effect shown in the attached GIF using JDE 2.3.4beta3 and cedet1.0beta2 on Emacs 21.3. All non-public methods are 'overlined', which is really not pleasant. I guess it's some kind of highlighting of non-public methods that has gone wrong

jde-xref works for some methods, not for others

2004-04-28 Thread Raul Acevedo
I have a large project (almost 2,000 Java files), and sometimes jde-xref works in finding callers, sometimes it doesn't. It seems to be on a per-class basis; i.e. any method in class A I can list callers, but in class B no callers are found for any methods. Looking at the xrefdb directory, it

[jde] cedet-1.0beta1 /Semantic 2.0 and JDEE-2.3.2

2003-11-06 Thread Raul Acevedo
Semantic 2.0 is out??? Paul Kinnucan wrote: Ed == Ed Soniat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ed I tried install JDEE-2.3.2 which claims compatibility with Ed Semantic 1.blah.blah or greater. Semantic 2.0 deleted Ed semantic-bnf in Aug/03 or so. Ed The change log in

Re: occasional error compiling due to jde-xref-compile-hook

2003-11-06 Thread Raul Acevedo
Andrew Hyatt wrote: Thanks, this looks like a bug. For the time being, substitute with this line: (add-hook 'jde-compile-finish-hook 'jde-xref-update-caller-table) That isn't defined either and eventually gives me the same undefined error. [1462]

Re[1]: [jde] cedet-1.0beta1 /Semantic 2.0 and JDEE-2.3.2

2003-11-06 Thread Raul Acevedo
it. Eric Raul Acevedo [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to think that: Semantic 2.0 is out??? Paul Kinnucan wrote: Ed == Ed Soniat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ed I tried install JDEE-2.3.2 which claims compatibility with Ed Semantic 1.blah.blah or greater

occasional error compiling due to jde-xref-compile-hook

2003-11-05 Thread Raul Acevedo
I occasionally get the following error when I compile a Java file: error in process filter: Symbol's function definition is void: jde-xref-compile-hook. If I grep for jde-xref-compile-hook in the JDE sources, I find only one reference in jde-xref.el: (add-hook 'jde-compile-finish-hook

missing features in jde?

2002-09-30 Thread Raul Acevedo
, or will they be provided in a future release? Thanks, Raul Acevedo [EMAIL PROTECTED]