On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 01:59, guy wrote:
> jdev,
>
> I am a new one, and have read some jabber protocol, I want to develop an IM
>software in java based on jabber, how should I start to?
>
>
> guy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2002-12-04
>
>
jdev£¬
I am a new one, and have read some jabber protocol, I want to develop an IM
software in java based on jabber, how should I start to?
guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2002-12-04
__
jdev£¬
I am a new one, and have read some jabber protocol, I want to develop an IM
software in java based on jabber, how should I start to?
guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2002-12-04
__
I don't see the point of B, when there already exists a similar concept over
HTTP port 80. And even if port 80 was blocked, but 25 was open, it would be
more efficient to just connect over 25, use proper SMTP to identify as a
Jabber client, like with the HELO command, and then just pretend the
You wouldn't redirect them to a different server, you would redirect
them to a different IP that is part of the same server. Basically
different c2s processes. For more information on where I see this going:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/Jabber-Server-F
Hi all,
Ok, there might be an issue with one of the dependancies of MU-C. I'm
currently working on coding a replacement, so watch this space.
Regards,
David
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:53:18PM -, Rob Davis wrote:
>
> Hi David
>
> How is the MUC fix coming along?
>
> Here's the versi
a) you can send email from jabber clients, or
b) replacing normal jabber port and protocols with client and
server-side plugins which sends each well-formed chunk of a stream as a
plausible RFC-compliant email (and thus stands a chance of getting
through many circuit-level firewalls?)
ok, it woul
You can do it but it is not part of the spec as far
as I am aware, and even if you do do it, it is the same as so
whats the point? It might even cause problems with some clients that are
expecting no type for available presences.
- Original Message -
From:
Adrian Brown
To
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:03:24PM +, Adrian Brown wrote:
> Isn't it a type attribute of like unavailable?
Yes.
is valid but semantically equivalent to
.
Ralphm
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
Isn't it a type attribute of like unavailable?
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 02:51 pm, Richard Dobson wrote:
There is no such type as "available" thats why it wont add it, the lack of a type means it is an availability packet.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Brown
To:
There is no such type as "available" thats why it
wont add it, the lack of a type means it is an availability packet.
Richard
- Original Message -
From:
Adrian Brown
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:30
PM
Subject: [JDEV] Jabber Client and
I'm trying to send a packet to another client (in my effort to avoid rosters - which are pointless for my client), In constructing
the packet to send to a specified address, I've tried adding the type = 'available' but when I look at the debug, this is never sent or received. But the presence p
Hi everyone:
I'm new to jabber and i've got a trouble
with the ICQv7-transport. I've got the following
Router connection error
Shuting down
Can anyone help me?. I've been seen the
same bug for other jabber's developers.
Sorry for my bad English.
Ahora podés usar Ya
13 matches
Mail list logo