Hi,
msn-transport-1.2.1 is not working on my jabberd-1.4.2 server.So what should I do to solve that problem?which version of msn-transport should I use to support new MSN messenger 6.0 and where can I get it from?
I'll be very thankfull to you ,If I get solution as soon as possible.
Regar
The JECL builds are now available here:
http://jecl.jabberstudio.org/builds/
Peter
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:09:15AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I've contacted the folks at Jabber Inc. about this. It seems they
> removed these files from their website (they got rid of all the
> developer
Carsten Breuer wrote:
Between two endpoints there are many things like firewalls, routers and
the like, this leads to the only solution: a relay or a server.
Which of course has some obvious drawbacks. First thing is that
someone needs to provide a server (for free) and a _lot_ of bandwidth,
esp
Hi Bart, hi all,
Between two endpoints there are many things like firewalls, routers and
the like, this leads to the only solution: a relay or a server.
Which of course has some obvious drawbacks. First thing is that someone
needs to provide a server (for free) and a _lot_ of bandwidth,
especi
Hi Ulrich,
there are multiple plans to do native transmission.
Before starting to hack a solution you should think about broadening the
scenario ... it is very nonsense to do just one-to-one conferencing in a
solution ... and as soon as you start mixing streams the trouble begins and
performance
Hi Greg,
thanks for the answer.
The only video conferencing I've seen using jabber is mine, but I might have
missed something. I use the Flashcom server for the audio/video part, you
can use the http port if necessary for that. It requires either running your
own flashcom server, free but a max o
Hoi Bart,
Comment on your BTW...
(BTW why can anyone expain to me why JEP65 doesn't work with SOCKS5
servers :? Couldn't find that in the JEP, it only says that it doesn't
work)
Probably because a standard SOCKS5 proxy does not normally get signalled
through a Jabber message to set up a con
Between two endpoints there are many things like firewalls, routers and
the like, this leads to the only solution: a relay or a server.
Which of course has some obvious drawbacks. First thing is that someone
needs to provide a server (for free) and a _lot_ of bandwidth,
especially if you're goin
Hi Carsten,
there are multiple plans to do native transmission.
Before starting to hack a solution you should think about broadening the
scenario ... it is very nonsense to do just one-to-one conferencing in a
solution ...
and as soon as you start mixing streams the trouble begins and
performa
I have been trying several months to gain any information about QQ
protocol with no results.
It is good idea to write QQ transport.
I can help writting QQ transport.
Lukas
Yobb wrote:
Yes, It is. We can setup a team to crack the QQ's protocol, i think it is good for all the users.
- Origi
10 matches
Mail list logo