Is there no way to get a list of all connected users on jabberd 1.4,
apart from looking at the users' spool directory? (The iq stanza
described by the protocol produces an error code on 1.4.3)
Is there a way to see if a particular users is online, except looking at
that user's .xml file?
Hi
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:53:42 +0200, John Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there no way to get a list of all connected users on jabberd 1.4,
apart from looking at the users' spool directory? (The iq stanza
described by the protocol produces an error code on 1.4.3)
Is there a way to see if
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:06:29 +0200, Remko Troncon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
, there is a main chat room, you
can leave a persistent message on a messageboard... Try BorgChat (only
for windows), you will have my point of view.
These are more 'special' features, and doesn't necessarily fall
False alarm. It works. There's something I was doing, sorry.
Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:53:42 +0200, John Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there no way to get a list of all connected users on jabberd 1.4,
apart from looking at the users' spool directory? (The iq
Is anyone thinking of making a Google Talk transport for Jabber?
I was thinking of making a general XMPP transport for jabber. You
would have to register with it to supply your gtalk account details.
Also when you set it up on your server you would override the
@gmail.com with the transport, and then all your google talk stuff is
100% transparent to the user
Hi John,
I'm building a stand-alone proxy/bridge that accepts connections from
legacy clients and connects them to any XMPP complient service - Google
Talk included. Is this the kind of functionality you're looking for?
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:46:16AM +0300, John Talbot wrote:
Is anyone
Hey does this mean I could use my MSN client to connect to my jabber server?
I think that would be pretty funny.
On 03/10/05, Rory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
I'm building a stand-alone proxy/bridge that accepts connections from
legacy clients and connects them to any XMPP complient
Oops. Sorry Norman - when I said 'legacy clients' I meant jabber clients
that don't yet support XMPP. My bad.
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:50:51PM +0200, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
Hey does this mean I could use my MSN client to connect to my jabber server?
I think that would be pretty funny.
By "legacy clients" you mean ICQ, MSN, Yahoo?
If so, no, my client is a Jabber client that can only connect to one
Jabber server at a time.
What I'm hoping for is a jabber transport, a component, that would make
my server be able to allow its users to talk to their Google Talk
buddies.
I'm
Sorry about that John, what I meant by 'legacy client' was a jabber
client that does not yet support XMPP. My mistake.
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:55:52AM +0300, John Talbot wrote:
By legacy clients you mean ICQ, MSN, Yahoo?
If so, no, my client is a Jabber client that can only connect to one
On 03/10/05, Rory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that John, what I meant by 'legacy client' was a jabber
client that does not yet support XMPP. My mistake.
Have to admit: I didn't know these existed.
--
- Norman Rasmussen
- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Home page:
Would it be better if I said a jabber client that doesn't yet
support TLS using 'starttls', SASL authentication, etc?
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
On 03/10/05, Rory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that John, what I meant by 'legacy client' was a
Nice idea.
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
I was thinking of making a general XMPP transport for jabber. You
would have to register with it to supply your gtalk account details.
Also when you set it up on your server you would override the
@gmail.com with the transport, and then all your google
...but why the phrase was thinking? Aren't you thinking of going ahead
anymore?
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
I was thinking of making a general XMPP transport for jabber. You
would have to register with it to supply your gtalk account details.
Also when you set it up on your server you would
I'm hoping that google will enable s2s before I have time to code it :-P
On 03/10/05, John Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...but why the phrase was thinking? Aren't you thinking of going ahead
anymore?
Norman Rasmussen wrote:
I was thinking of making a general XMPP transport for jabber.
Great IDEA!!
John Talbot wrote:
Is anyone thinking of making a Google Talk transport for Jabber?
Gosh, there's always s2s, isn't there?
rek2 GNU/Linux LO LO LO wrote:
Great IDEA!!
John Talbot wrote:
Is anyone thinking of making a Google Talk transport for Jabber?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
lol yap but is google going to actually use s2s thats the question :-)
will be nice if they did.
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Gosh, there's always s2s, isn't there?
rek2 GNU/Linux LO LO LO wrote:
Great IDEA!!
John Talbot wrote:
Is anyone thinking of making a Google Talk transport for
lol yap but is google going to actually use s2s thats the question :-)
will be nice if they did.
Google has committed to supporting s2s. For more details, check out the
live chat from last week that a lead Google Talk engineer was a part of:
I would guess that Google would be willing to open up to a network of
other jabber servers once the problem of spam is solved.
The only reason we don't have spam (spim, rather) now on the Jabber
network is that the market is too small for it.
It remains though to be seen whether a formula
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:47, John Talbot wrote:
I would guess that Google would be willing to open up to a network of
other jabber servers once the problem of spam is solved.
...or rather, once they've written the S2S support for their custom server.
TX
--
Email: Trejkaz Xaoza
On 10/2/05, John Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By legacy clients you mean ICQ, MSN, Yahoo?
If so, no, my client is a Jabber client that can only connect to one Jabber
server at a time.
What I'm hoping for is a jabber transport, a component, that would make my
server be able to allow its
yap I have jabber and gtalk .. but it will really be nice to just have
to connect to one ;-)
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 10/2/05, John Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By legacy clients you mean ICQ, MSN, Yahoo?
If so, no, my client is a Jabber client that can only connect to one Jabber
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:47 AM, John Talbot wrote:
It remains though to be seen whether a formula can be worked out to
combat the spam possibilities. It could be something along the lines
of ill-behaving jabber servers being blocked from the network of the
SPIM-fighting servers. But it's easy to
Hi,
thanks for this new release :)
Juste a question, browsing services, under msn transport it have
connect all registered users and stats of pymsnt.
Can we use it ?
if yes, how ?
Thanks
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:31:10 +1000
James Bunton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
PyMSNt 0.10 has
Matthew Terenzio wrote:
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:47 AM, John Talbot wrote:
It remains though to be seen whether a formula can be worked out to
combat the spam possibilities. It could be something along the lines
of ill-behaving jabber servers being blocked from the network of the
SPIM-fighting
I am trying it.. but every 5 m boots me out saying that I registered
somewhere else... but I didn't...
Nahuel ANGELINETTI wrote:
Hi,
thanks for this new release :)
Juste a question, browsing services, under msn transport it have
connect all registered users and stats of pymsnt.
Can we use
28 matches
Mail list logo
