On 12/31/05, Remko Troncon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 31 Dec 2005, at 5:29, Andro wrote:
>
> > --with-speex=/usr/include/speex/ doesn't make the trick, I get
>
> As far as i can tell, that's not a valid speex prefix. Configure
> looks for PREFIX/include/speex.h or PREFIX/include/speex/speex.
On 1/2/06, bernhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm new on the mailinglist - hallo to all.
>
> At the moment I'm working on a browser-based (jep-0124) jabber pubsub
> client.
> Pubsub is new and I have some questions.
>
> User - Pubsub relation
> ---
> Is there a rel
No there is no particular reason,
a wildfire plugin solves also the problem.
ContentFilter is a very good example. The installation and configuration
of the contentfilter plugin was unproblematic but I could not see how to
use the plugin. Should I write an application to test the functionality
Op maandag 02 januari 2006 01:50, schreef Sathish R:
> Hi friends,
>
> I am new to this mailing list and jabber. I like to develop something
> interesting using jabber (as a hobby). But there are many clients and
> servers. Is there anything new that can be done with jabber? If anyone has
> any ide
Hi all
I'm new on the mailinglist - hallo to all.
At the moment I'm working on a browser-based (jep-0124) jabber pubsub
client.
Pubsub is new and I have some questions.
User - Pubsub relation
---
Is there a relation between user-jid und pubsub "home-node"?
As I have seen,
The Jabber Software Foundation is currently holding is quarterly
application period for new and renewing members. The membership is free
and puts you in the position to shape the future of Jabber.
If you are interested in becoming a member of the JSF, please create a
Wiki page here:
http://wik
Hello,
I'm currently working on some small utils for jabber as Open Source. I write
it in C++/Qt, with an attempt to make it cross-platform. My current project
is Jaboard - jabber draw board, something like MSN whiteboard, but as a
stand-alone program.
If you do not want to think of something n
On 12/31/05, Matthias Wimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI Vinod!
>
> Vinod Panicker schrieb:
>
> >The RFC states that SASL must be done after TLS. Though its not
> >expressly forbidden, I doubt that TLS+dialback was ever intended in
> >the first place, since Dialback was written much before the