Re: [jdev] Beginning Jabber Client Development!

Hello, On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 02:03:58PM -0800, Sönmez Kartal wrote: I'll do this client application for commercial use. I'm on open source side but I have to live too! :-) Even commercial apps can sometimes be Open Source. You just have to give the code with it and you can not fee for

[jdev] 2nd interop event / devcon

We've begun preliminary planning for an interop event and developer get-together right before FOSDEM 2007 in late February. Preliminary information is here: http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Interop_Event More details will be posted there (and on this list) as the plans solidify. Thanks! Peter

[jdev] XMPP PubSub client

Does anybody know if any of the existing Jabber clients out there supports PubSub (XEP-0060)?Thanks!

Re: [jdev] XMPP PubSub client

On 11/14/06, Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know if any of the existing Jabber clients out there supports PubSub (XEP-0060)? I think Psi nightlies are supporting PEP, not quite the same though. -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page:

Re: [jdev] XMPP PubSub client

Tkabber supports PubSub on client side as far as i know.On 11/14/06, Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know if any of the existing Jabber clients out there supports PubSub (XEP-0060)? Thanks!

Re: [jdev] XMPP PubSub client

Tong schreef: Does anybody know if any of the existing Jabber clients out there supports PubSub (XEP-0060)? http://coccinella.cvs.sourceforge.net/coccinella/coccinella/READMEs/README-xmpp?revision=1.1view=markup -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze.

[jdev] An old pseudo standard, but is it still good?

Hi folk, Today I was having a discussion with another developer about one of the 'standards' that's been in place for a little while and it got me waffling back and forth as to whether it's a good standard or not. I'll get right to the point: MSN username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber MSN

Re: [jdev] An old pseudo standard, but is it still good?

Daniel Henninger wrote: MSN username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber MSN translated JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] So where did this use of % come from? As far as I know, % was used in the same way in very old times, in SMTP, in cases when it was impossible to send email directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [jdev] An old pseudo standard, but is it still good?

On 11/14/06, Daniel Henninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where did % come from? Why is it a pseudo standard to date? It's called the percent hack and had something to do with email relaying in ye olden days. http://www.livinginternet.com/e/ew_addr.htm -- Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)