Dnia 15-12-2006, pią o godzinie 18:22 +0100, Jacek Konieczny napisał(a):
> In most cases users don't need to see the URIs and application and web
> site developers should know what they are doing.
Yeah... Right...
But it's a REAL world we're living in...
--
Tomasz Sterna
Xiaoka Grp. http://www.
Depends on encoding
is encoding="us-ascii"
> Is it possible to use ?
>
>
UTF-8 does not allow
use
Bernhard
On 12/15/06, Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And last, but not least... HTML is squashing whitespace. So.. Bye bye
indentation. All pasted code, tables etc. ends up completely unreadable.
Is it possible to use ?
--
Regards,
Oleg
We (especially Chris Mullins) also brought this up many many many many
many many many times during the experimental stages of this XEP
Of course, there is nothing stopping you from creating a XHTML-Body XEP
that allows free form...
-JD
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> There's to much ambiguity in this form.
> xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED] look to similar.
But they are different. Like http://www.xmpp.org/ is different than
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] And in most cases xmpp://[EMA
Hi Tomasz,
i brought up this discussion multiple times in the past.
As you said creating the X-HTML is the biggest problem. Another problem
is that we allow only a small subset of tags and attributes. There are
toolkits which you can use to create (X)HTML, but the output is not
valid accordin
Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dnia 15-12-2006, pią o godzinie 13:38 +0100, Magnus Henoch napisał(a):
>
>> Speaking of which, I want to encourage client authors to support the
>> form xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED] to mean "set up this account for use".
>
>
> -1
>
> There's to much ambiguit
Ralph Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting use case. However, I would expect something more along the
> lines of the following:
>
>xmpp://example.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> or
>xmpp://example.com/example.com?register;username=test
>
> or, as I am not too fond of actions inside U
Hi.
I am wondering, whether we didn't shoot our foot with this spec.
I'm implementing it now, and it's a real PITA.
It's clear for me now, why many clients implemented reading XHTML-IM
messages, but not writing them.
To display it, you just put an HTML-enabled text control from your GUI
toolkit o
Dnia 15-12-2006, pią o godzinie 13:38 +0100, Magnus Henoch napisał(a):
> Speaking of which, I want to encourage client authors to support the
> form xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED] to mean "set up this account for use".
-1
There's to much ambiguity in this form.
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and xmpp://[EMAI
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:38 +0100, Magnus Henoch wrote:
> Ralph Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you wanted to have a specific service to connect to before accessing
> > the resource, you'd do:
> >
> > xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Home
> >
> > This means: open an XMPP
On 12/15/06, Ishan De Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way that we can map an XMPP URI to the general URI format
where we don't have the "node@" component? I mean can we have
xmpp://example.com/node/Home?
Are you thinking for example pubsub nodes?
xmpp:pubsub.jabber.org/node/over/he
Ralph Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you wanted to have a specific service to connect to before accessing
> the resource, you'd do:
>
> xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Home
>
> This means: open an XMPP connection to the server at example.org using
> account 'test', and then
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:08 +0100, Ralph Meijer wrote:
> Complementing Cecil
Sorry, I meant Cedric. Misfired neuron, probably.
--
Groetjes,
ralphm
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 16:38 +0530, Ishan De Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Generally a URI is of the form "scheme://authority/path". For example
> http://www.example.com/index.html
>
> A JID is of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource. If we have a JID
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Home, according to RFC 4622, the
Hi,
This page from the Java doc gives an short non java related
introduction on URI
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/index.html
-Quote-
A hierarchical URI is subject to further parsing according to the
syntax
[scheme:][//authority][path][?query][#fragment]
where the charact
Hi,
Generally a URI is of the form "scheme://authority/path". For example
http://www.example.com/index.html
A JID is of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource. If we have a JID
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Home, according to RFC 4622, the XMPP URI take the
form xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Home.
Is there a
17 matches
Mail list logo
