Le mercredi 06 février 2008 à 10:58 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le vendredi 28 décembre 2007 à 09:39 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
Well of course you can define your own protocol, but I would bet that
other people are interested in similar
Hello, in the lasts months I have seen new gateways/transports, (like google
talk or mxit) There are any plan to add them to the XMPP Registrar?
http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html#gateway
El Viernes 08 Febrero 2008, tjabber escribió:
As a newbie I'm trying to come up to speed on all things jabber for writing
an adapter to an existing IM client. I'm finding some of the terminology
hard to find definitions for and the mental model a bit difficult to build.
For example, in
On Feb 5, 2008 7:14 PM, Dan Hulme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SEND: iq type='set' id='1007'bind
xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'resource[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/resource/bind/iq
Can you ask Coccinella to use a different resource? If you remove the @ does
it help? (I'm thinking that having an
tjabber schrieb:
For example, in reading the privacy list spec, it was never clear to me why
I would need multiple lists and why would I make one active over another?
And what is invisibility? I've searched a lot on these, but I haven't found
an answer.
you don't need to. You can have multiple
