Re: [jdev] Bug in jabberd2 (2.1.13) on win32

2008-02-20 Thread Sander Devrieze
2008/2/8, Norman Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Feb 5, 2008 7:14 PM, Dan Hulme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SEND: iq type='set' id='1007'bind xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'resource[EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource/bind/iq Can you ask Coccinella to use a different resource? If you

Re: [jdev] Bug in jabberd2 (2.1.13) on win32

2008-02-20 Thread Dan Hulme
No, this problem is not fixed yet. Changing the Coccinella id makes no difference. With the latest build (svn557), the behavior has changed slightly, however. Instead of returning an error, Coccinella hangs and eventually times out. The server shows it has successfully authorized but no

Re: [jdev] Why is my jabber server kicking out a remote user on anerror?

2008-02-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Tom Kalafut wrote: Changing to an iq stanza kicked the user out, too :( Do I have to use an error code not listed in the discussion link? Either that or wait for this bug to be fixed (I am not sure if the fix made it into the soon-to-be-released ejabberd 2.0.0, but you might want to ask on

Re: [jdev] Why is my jabber server kicking out a remote useron anerror?

2008-02-20 Thread Tom Kalafut
Oops. I did use error code not_acceptable, so it's not that. It's apparently kicking out the user that sent an iq stanza of type error (any code). I think I understand now. Apparently, ejabberd is kicking out the user in the Line 294 check because the 'to' is a chatroom JID, no matter what

Re: [jdev] Why is my jabber server kicking out a remote useron anerror?

2008-02-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Tom Kalafut wrote: Oops. I did use error code not_acceptable, so it's not that. It's apparently kicking out the user that sent an iq stanza of type error (any code). I think I understand now. Apparently, ejabberd is kicking out the user in the Line 294 check because the 'to' is a

Re: [jdev] XEP-0198 implementation

2008-02-20 Thread Joe Hildebrand
On Dec 3, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Justin Karneges wrote: Maybe there are some clarifications left to make. I'll check. I was wondering what the next steps were for last call. Does Joe have anything further to add? I recall the next step being stpeter reformatting the spec into something