Re: [jdev] Game accouncements and Jabber

2009-03-09 Thread Yann Leboulanger
ajmas wrote: Can anyone tell me whether any clients have added support for XEP-0196: User Gaming? Maybe because Client dev don't play :) Maybe because it's hard to know whether User is playing (Games don't announce via D-Bus that it's running, like User Tune) Just my 2 cent -- Yann

[jdev] Default SOCKS5 proxy

2009-03-09 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Hi, We are implementing SOCKS5 support in telepathy-gabble and are wondering if there are any public proxies which are happy to relay data and could be considered as a default fallback? I found the following public proxies which are currently working: proxy.netlab.cz (used by Gajim as default)

Re: [jdev] Game accouncements and Jabber

2009-03-09 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 09.03.2009 um 08:25 schrieb Yann Leboulanger: Maybe because Client dev don't play :) Maybe because it's hard to know whether User is playing (Games don't announce via D-Bus that it's running, like User Tune) I think the question was who implemented games and not why not ;). Anyway, Gajim

Re: [jdev] Default SOCKS5 proxy

2009-03-09 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 09.03.2009 um 13:28 schrieb Guillaume Desmottes: I found the following public proxies which are currently working: proxy.netlab.cz (used by Gajim as default) and proxy.jabberfr.org. Those are very unreliable. proxy.jabber.org doesn't seem to work. It has been removed a while ago. I

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 3/9/09 3:20 PM, anders conbere wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a venue for community discussion. I'm calling this the Monthly XMPP Meeting or MXM (you can pronounce it like

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 3/9/09 2:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a venue for community discussion. I'm calling this the Monthly XMPP Meeting or MXM (you can pronounce it like mix 'em). I propose that we hold the first discussion this Thursday, March

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Dirk Meyer
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 3/9/09 2:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a venue for community discussion. I'm calling this the Monthly XMPP Meeting or MXM (you can pronounce it like mix 'em). I propose that we hold the first

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 3/9/09 4:15 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote: Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 3/9/09 2:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a venue for community discussion. I'm calling this the Monthly XMPP Meeting or MXM (you can pronounce it like mix 'em). I

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Dirk Meyer
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: One solution here is to build out a developer-oriented documentation site. As we discussed in Brussels, Python developers don't read the PEPs, they read the docs. Right We have only XEPs because it's a lot of work to write developer-friendly docs, but we have a

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Sander Devrieze
2009/3/9 Dirk Meyer dme...@tzi.de: snip And I missed something I hate about XMPP: the name. You can google something, you can send a mail, browse the web, you can even skype someone. But I can't XMPP -- it is not word. The POV of the Coccinella project is like these keywords in the

Re: [jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting

2009-03-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 3/9/09 4:46 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote: Peter Saint-Andre wrote: One solution here is to build out a developer-oriented documentation site. As we discussed in Brussels, Python developers don't read the PEPs, they read the docs. Right We have only XEPs because it's a lot of work to write