like IP packets...
- Original Message -
From: Dave Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jabber software development list jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Re: VTD-XML version 1.6
On Mon May 22 23:30:01 2006, Jimmy Zhang wrote:
http://www.cisco.com
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps6438/c1031/cdccont_0900aecd803fa77d.pdf
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jabber software development list jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Re: VTD-XML version
On Mon May 22 23:30:01 2006, Jimmy Zhang wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps6438/c1031/cdccont_0900aecd803fa77d.pdf
Cisco drugs, eh? They're strong stuff. Watch yourself.
Cisco here is basically talking about using a common layer to handle
common application
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Jimmy Zhang wrote:
2. In the future, XML capability will get built into the network layer, but
if a message is not well-formed
XML, they are less likely to take advantage of those capabilities of network
routers and switches, again
hindering adoption
I suspect
On Sat May 20 05:56:19 2006, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Friday 19 May 2006 20:39, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
But it turns out that streaming XML has some inherent benefits,
one of
which is that you don't have to create a new parser instance
every time
you want to send, receive, or route a
- Original Message -
From: Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jabber software development list jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Re: VTD-XML version 1.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jimmy Zhang wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, after
what runs on the wire.
It seems you just misunderstand it completely. Could you read the
specifications?
- Original Message -
From: Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jabber software development list jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Re: VTD
development list jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Re: VTD-XML version 1.6
On Sat May 20 05:56:19 2006, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Friday 19 May 2006 20:39, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
But it turns out that streaming XML has some inherent benefits,
one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
you confused me even more...
I thought IM apps exchange xml messages (usually small),
let me explain XMPP with this small example of a session:
the client connects, open the socket and the XML Document
C-S: ?xml version=1.0?
C-S: stream:stream
I like xmpp a lot better than SIP ... it ought to replace SIP in the
future
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Gnauck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:31 PM
Subject: [jdev] Re: VTD-XML version 1.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
you confused me
Message -
From: Jimmy Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jabber software development list jdev@jabber.org
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Re: VTD-XML version 1.6
I like xmpp a lot better than SIP ... it ought to replace SIP in the
future
- Original Message -
From
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jimmy Zhang wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, after read your examples a bit more, I had only
more questions...
why not exchanging well-formed XML messages for each request and
response like SIP??
Because SIP sucks?
But seriously, Jabber/XMPP
12 matches
Mail list logo
