On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org wrote:
If someone else has implemented SCRAM-SHA-1 here, I would be interested
in performing some interop testing with my implementation.
Hi there,
I too am trying to implement SCRAM-*(starting with SHA-1 here) for use in a
Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net writes:
On Tue Nov 3 15:58:34 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
So hopefully it is Just A Small Matter of, err, reordering the
fields
and things will work. Hopefully.
Nope - my implementation and the specification have obviously drifted
considerably.
I think
Tobias Markmann tmarkm...@googlemail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org wrote:
If someone else has implemented SCRAM-SHA-1 here, I would be interested
in performing some interop testing with my implementation.
Hi there,
I too am trying to
Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes:
However I cannot find any test vectors for PBKDF2 which seems bad, I'll
see if I can put together a document on that.
Here it is:
http://josefsson.org/sasl-gs2/draft-josefsson-pbkdf2-test-vectors.txt
Comments? I'll submit it to the IETF shortly.
Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes:
Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org writes:
However I cannot find any test vectors for PBKDF2 which seems bad, I'll
see if I can put together a document on that.
Here it is:
http://josefsson.org/sasl-gs2/draft-josefsson-pbkdf2-test-vectors.txt
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org wrote:
Is anyone able to reproduce the test vectors?
I am able to reproduce the first three. Stopped the 4th after some minutes.
:)
Cheers,
Tobias Markmann
___
JDev mailing
Tobias Markmann tmarkm...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org wrote:
Is anyone able to reproduce the test vectors?
I am able to reproduce the first three.
And still not able to talk to GNU SASL? Interesting -- can you show
some
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org wrote:
And still not able to talk to GNU SASL? Interesting -- can you show
some example attempts?
Well, I can perfectly talk to gsasl however the proof i calculate doesn't
match the proof gsasl sends.
Here the output
On Tue Nov 3 06:33:09 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
The latest release [1] of GNU SASL [2] has support for the new SASL
mechanism SCRAM-SHA-1 and I'm trying to find interested jabber/XMPP
implementers who are interested in testing how well it works in the
XMPP
protocol. Feel free to join
Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net writes:
On Tue Nov 3 06:33:09 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
The latest release [1] of GNU SASL [2] has support for the new SASL
mechanism SCRAM-SHA-1 and I'm trying to find interested jabber/XMPP
implementers who are interested in testing how well it works in
On Tue Nov 3 09:48:44 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net writes:
I have both an implementation of it and a suite of protocol
implementations that use it, including XMPP. (And IMAP, ESMTP,
and -
naturally - ACAP). I added SCRAM to see how much harder it was
than
Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net writes:
So in the short term, I can spin that up against whatever concrete
server you have that'll use SCRAM-SHA-1, I think. I believe it'll
do
at least some forms of channel binding, too.
I have a public IMAP test server up and running with SCRAM-SHA-1
On Tue Nov 3 15:58:34 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
So hopefully it is Just A Small Matter of, err, reordering the
fields
and things will work. Hopefully.
Nope - my implementation and the specification have obviously drifted
considerably.
I think I've now brought my implementation into
Hi,
The latest release [1] of GNU SASL [2] has support for the new SASL
mechanism SCRAM-SHA-1 and I'm trying to find interested jabber/XMPP
implementers who are interested in testing how well it works in the XMPP
protocol. Feel free to join discussions on help-gs...@gnu.org, or
e-mail me
14 matches
Mail list logo
