Thanks for the reply! I think i will try advertising 'special' presence
information with a pub sub node for now and see how it fares against
implementing a new namespace..
Thanks!
--
santhosh.kulandaiyan
On 05/14/2008 8:04 AM, JabberForum wrote:
Thanks for the reply! I think i will try advertising 'special' presence
information with a pub sub node for now and see how it fares against
implementing a new namespace..
Sounds like a good plan!
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
Why not just send an additional stanza in a new namespace?
--
- Norman Rasmussen
- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
On Tue May 13 06:55:16 2008, JabberForum wrote:
XEP 115 talks about presence based messaging for entity
capabilities.
As an example, it talks about presence packets being sent like this
c xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/caps'
hash='sha-1'
node='http://code.google.com/p/exodus'
On 05/12/2008 11:55 PM, JabberForum wrote:
XEP 115 talks about presence based messaging for entity capabilities.
As an example, it talks about presence packets being sent like this
c xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/caps'
hash='sha-1'
node='http://code.google.com/p/exodus'
XEP 115 talks about presence based messaging for entity capabilities.
As an example, it talks about presence packets being sent like this
c xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/caps'
hash='sha-1'
node='http://code.google.com/p/exodus'
ver='QgayPKawpkPSDYmwT/WM94uAlu0='/
I have 2 questions.
(a) is
