Hi,
My goal here was just to point out some of the issues/scope etc so that you
and the present openjdk6 maintainers can decide how to proceed.
BTW you had written ' to accommodate usage of Visual Studio 2010 "
which I read as meaning allow in addition to VS 2003, not replace it.
-phil.
On 2/10
Phil,
First, I do have a license for VS2003. And more so, one can by vs2003
for some third party stores, it is just that Microsoft does not sell or
support VS2003.
The build problem with the compiler version is not my personal one.
There is a good point about figuring out what set of builds/t
There was a lot of work to the build system and source code
to upgrade JDK7 to VS2010. Whilst a good chunk of that work was
in closed repositories you will still find a fair amount to do ..
As many as we could find/remember about got a 'vs2010' label
So the query
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/is
* Ivan Krylov [2014-02-10 13:57]:
> The build system for OpenJDK6 for Windows uses Visual Studio 2003.
> This is a problem for those who do not have a license as you may not
> purchase this software anymore.
Ouch.
> The proposal is to modify the build systems and somewhat sources to
> accommodat
Hi Folks,
The build system for OpenJDK6 for Windows uses Visual Studio 2003. This is a
problem for those who do not have a license as you may not purchase this
software anymore.
The proposal is to modify the build systems and somewhat sources to accommodate
usage of Visual Studio 2010
If that i
