Changeset: 4173e592ffa3
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-12-15 21:23 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/4173e592ffa3
6938454: 2 new testcases for bug: Unable to determine generic type in program
that compiles under Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
Changeset: 20eebcd42dae
Author:ikrylov
Date: 2014-12-15 21:19 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/20eebcd42dae
6938454: Unable to determine generic type in program that compiles under Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
! src/share/classes/com/
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 15.12.2014 18:40, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > The main thing that concerns me is the loss of the original author
> > information, but I'm not sure if we have a solution for this as yet.
> > I tend to go with the original author as the changeset author
Hi Andrew,
On 15.12.2014 18:40, Andrew Hughes wrote:
The main thing that concerns me is the loss of the original author
information, but I'm not sure if we have a solution for this as yet.
I tend to go with the original author as the changeset author
(hg commit --user ) but that also has the dow
- Original Message -
> resending to the right mail thread:
>
>
> Hi Andrew and all,
>
> I am about to push this change for Nikolay.
> Given that last time we had a bit of discussion on the right format of
> putback message, i want to check with you this the following is fine.
> Please ch
resending to the right mail thread:
Hi Andrew and all,
I am about to push this change for Nikolay.
Given that last time we had a bit of discussion on the right format of
putback message, i want to check with you this the following is fine.
Please check the text below and tell me if you see an
Oops, wrong thread, sorry.
I meant to reply on Nikolay's letter about
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK
6u45 compiles fine
Thanks,
Ivan
On 15/12/2014 17:56, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Hi Andrew and all,
I am about to push this change for Nikolay.
Given that las
Hi Andrew and all,
I am about to push this change for Nikolay.
Given that last time we had a bit of discussion on the right format of
putback message, i want to check with you this the following is fine.
Please check the text below and tell me if you see any issues.
According to Nikolay, this f
- Original Message -
> On 15/12/2014 13:17, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Yes, this is a problem with the way Sun/Oracle maintain JAXP and JAXWS; the
> > sources
> > are bulk updated outside of security updates, so there's no log of changes.
> > At least
> > now they do keep the sources in the O
On 15/12/2014 13:17, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Yes, this is a problem with the way Sun/Oracle maintain JAXP and JAXWS; the
sources
are bulk updated outside of security updates, so there's no log of changes. At
least
now they do keep the sources in the OpenJDK tree rather than as external zip
files.
- Original Message -
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Thank you for your reply. My apologies for the late reply.
>
> Unfortunately, I try to search the commit of this fix, but I could not find
> it.
>
> So I wrote the patch to solve this problem. If set less than 1 to the second
> parameter
> of HttpServe
Hi Ivan,
Thank you for your reply. My apologies for the late reply.
Unfortunately, I try to search the commit of this fix, but I could not find it.
So I wrote the patch to solve this problem. If set less than 1 to the second
parameter
of HttpServer#create, HttpServer is created with the defaul
12 matches
Mail list logo
