ne generic type in program that compiles under
Java 6
Reviewed-by: aph
Contributed-by: nikgor
On 11/12/2014 22:01, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/11/2014 06:59 PM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
Me and my colleagues have a consensus that the patch is important to us -
we are responsible for introducing
we are
interested in upstreaming it to OpenJDK 6 itself to minimize the difference
in codebase.
Thanks,
Nikolay
On 10.12.2014 19:56, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/10/2014 04:32 PM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
I see your point that we chose a risky way and remember discussions
around
http
Hi Andrew,
OK, I see, thank you for this point!
Indeed, the fix is just a backport of JDK-6938454 to OpenJDK 6.
Thanks,
Nikolay
On 10.12.2014 19:11, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Please, review the fix for
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle
, fixing
regressions) is more preferable than moving to pre- JDK-6650759 state where
we had known incompatibilities.
Thanks,
Nikolay
On 10.12.2014 15:31, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/10/2014 12:06 PM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
Please, review the fix for
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the
Please, review the fix for
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK 6u45
compiles fine
This is a regression of the fix for OPENJDK6-35 (which is a backport of
JDK-6650759 to OpenJDK 6). In OpenJDK 7 this regression existed too -
it was tracked as
JDK-6938454: Unab
Hello Mario, Andrew,
I'd like to propose the following changeset comment format for situations
when the creator and the backporter of the fix are two different persons:
1234567: NPE thrown on FileInputStream("")
Summary: Rewrite precondition-checking code in io.c
Reviewed-by: mr
Contributed-by:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for the link to the fix discussion. I see the point.
Sections of the JLS dedicated to inferring type arguments have
been changed for Java 7, and 6650759 implements (fully or
partially) these changes. JBS says 6650759 is an enhancement,
not a bug. Also,
www.oracle.com/technetw
Hi Andrew,
From my previous experience I can say that it's common practice
to indicate in commit messages who prepared and integrated
these particular bits and who reviewed them. Here is a couple
of examples where original fixes and backports are nearly identical,
but their commit messages refer
