Re: tagged the repos: jdk6-b24 [Re: OpenJDK6 B24]

2011-11-15 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Fantastic. Thank you Lana! -kto On Nov 15, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Lana Steuck wrote: > An update on the b24 release. > > We are almost finished, waiting for the RE team to publish the official > source bundles. Then I'll post the usual summary (list of changes, location > of the source bundles, t

tagged the repos: jdk6-b24 [Re: OpenJDK6 B24]

2011-11-15 Thread Lana Steuck
An update on the b24 release. We are almost finished, waiting for the RE team to publish the official source bundles. Then I'll post the usual summary (list of changes, location of the source bundles, test results, etc.) ETA: tomorrow. The main tasks have been already finished: - I built/test

Re: code review request: 7110373: krb5 test in openjdk6 without test infrastructure (was Re: test failure security/krb5/auto/SpnegoReqFlags.java [was - Re: OpenJDK6 B24])

2011-11-10 Thread Sean Mullan
Looks fine to me. --Sean On 11/10/2011 02:34 AM, Weijun Wang wrote: Please take a review. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/7110373/webrev.00/ It's just removing the test file. BTW, I've added subCR of 6-open for 6815182 and 6979329 in our bug database and marked them Fix Available. Seems t

Re: test failure security/krb5/auto/SpnegoReqFlags.java [was - Re: OpenJDK6 B24]

2011-11-10 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Excellent! Thanks for doing this. -kto On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Lana Steuck wrote: > Below is an update about OpenJdk6 b24 release. > > There were a number of minor issues with the build (infrastructure, not > related to jdk6 code) which got resolved. > I had built openjdk6 on all 8 platf

code review request: 7110373: krb5 test in openjdk6 without test infrastructure (was Re: test failure security/krb5/auto/SpnegoReqFlags.java [was - Re: OpenJDK6 B24])

2011-11-09 Thread Weijun Wang
Please take a review. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/7110373/webrev.00/ It's just removing the test file. BTW, I've added subCR of 6-open for 6815182 and 6979329 in our bug database and marked them Fix Available. Seems they were never created. Thanks Weijun On 11/10/2011 11:18 AM, La

Re: test failure security/krb5/auto/SpnegoReqFlags.java [was - Re: OpenJDK6 B24]

2011-11-09 Thread Weijun Wang
> FWIW, backporting the framework is not adequate. Though the test > compiles after that, it still fails saying: Yes, it's tough. The basic test framework is only Action+Context+KDC+OneKDC. However, every now and then, with each new bug/RFE in Kerberos, these classes are enhanced to simulate n

Re: test failure security/krb5/auto/SpnegoReqFlags.java [was - Re: OpenJDK6 B24]

2011-11-09 Thread Deepak Bhole
* Lana Steuck [2011-11-09 22:40]: > Below is an update about OpenJdk6 b24 release. > > There were a number of minor issues with the build (infrastructure, > not related to jdk6 code) which got resolved. > I had built openjdk6 on all 8 platforms. There is a new test failure > on linux_i586 (and al

test failure security/krb5/auto/SpnegoReqFlags.java [was - Re: OpenJDK6 B24]

2011-11-09 Thread Lana Steuck
Below is an update about OpenJdk6 b24 release. There were a number of minor issues with the build (infrastructure, not related to jdk6 code) which got resolved. I had built openjdk6 on all 8 platforms. There is a new test failure on linux_i586 (and all other platforms). TEST: sun/security/krb

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Nov 4, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 11:11 Fri 04 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> I know that we have accepted some non-bulk changesets in the past, and >> hotspot in openjdk6 >> is a bit unusual. It's not clear to me that we will be getting many more >> bulk hotspot

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 11:11 Fri 04 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote: > I know that we have accepted some non-bulk changesets in the past, and > hotspot in openjdk6 > is a bit unusual. It's not clear to me that we will be getting many more bulk > hotspot changes > in openjdk6 as hotspot focuses on jdk7 and jdk8. Well I

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Kelly O'Hair
I know that we have accepted some non-bulk changesets in the past, and hotspot in openjdk6 is a bit unusual. It's not clear to me that we will be getting many more bulk hotspot changes in openjdk6 as hotspot focuses on jdk7 and jdk8. The only email I can find is: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/p

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 09:12 Fri 04 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote: > > FYI... > > There has been one hotspot change added: > >http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/37b3e89b0b84 > > -kto > Do you have a link to where this was discussed? We usually do bulk HotSpot imports for 6, not arbitrary change

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Kelly O'Hair
FYI... There has been one hotspot change added: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/37b3e89b0b84 -kto On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/03/2011 07:01 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> All security changes have been verified and are in the OpenJDK6 repos. > > Th

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/3/11 8:01 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > > FYI... > > All security changes have been verified and are in the OpenJDK6 repos. > > We are starting the release process for OpenJDK6 B24. Great, thanks Kelly! cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Amba

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/03/2011 07:01 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > All security changes have been verified and are in the OpenJDK6 repos. Thanks a lot, Kelly. Andrew.

Re: OpenJDK6 B24

2011-11-03 Thread Kelly O'Hair
FYI... All security changes have been verified and are in the OpenJDK6 repos. We are starting the release process for OpenJDK6 B24. -kto