On 4/27/12 11:31 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> back at FOSDEM I received a couple of questions about OpenJDK 6 future after
> the November
> 2012 date, with regard to Oracle's planned contributions to it. Tomas
> Nilsson, Oracle's
> outbound Principal Product Manager for Java SE let JUG le
On 6/6/12 3:05 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> That doesn't seem fair to me. This is stopping other members of the
> OpenJDK community from working on OpenJDK6, just because Oracle doesn't
> want to.
If someone wanted to step up and continue to work on OpenJDK 6 after November,
they could either:
a
- Original Message -
> On 5/30/12 5:53 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > In other words, does this also mean Oracle won't approve changes by
> > others
> > or make releases, or just that they won't contribute changes? If
> > so, can
> > someone else take over this role?
>
> I'd expect the Ope
On 5/30/12 5:53 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> In other words, does this also mean Oracle won't approve changes by others
> or make releases, or just that they won't contribute changes? If so, can
> someone else take over this role?
I'd expect the OpenJDK 6 Project to close its forests in November,
i
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> back at FOSDEM I received a couple of questions about OpenJDK 6
> future after the November
> 2012 date, with regard to Oracle's planned contributions to it. Tomas
> Nilsson, Oracle's
> outbound Principal Product Manager for Java SE let JUG leaders and
> Jav
