Re: Webrevs for 2014-07-15 Security Update

2014-07-16 Thread Andrew Haley
On 15/07/14 21:57, Omair Majid wrote: > Hi, > > This is a request for the retroactive approval for the 2014-07-15 > security patches. I accidentally pushed them before realizing that they > are not reviewed. > > Webrev is at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/2014-07-15/ > > This matche

Re: Changeset comment format (was Re: Review request for OPENJDK6-35: backport of JDK-6650759 to openjdk6)

2014-07-16 Thread Mario Torre
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 10:51 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > - Original Message - > > On 14/07/14 21:17, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote: > > > Hello Mario, Andrew, > > > > > > I'd like to propose the following changeset comment format for situations > > > when the creator and the backporter of the

OpenJDK6 B32 Now Available

2014-07-16 Thread Omair Majid
Hi, The OpenJDK6 b32 source release is now available for download: https://java.net/projects/openjdk6/downloads/download/openjdk-6-src-b32-15_jul_2014.tar.gz sha256sum: fe1eb7053fddfd325152f95f9719325e4ba67534a26fa690ca24fab75461a1fa Or: https://java.net/projects/openjdk6/downloads/download/op

Re: Do not JDK-6967684 backport to JDK6?

2014-07-16 Thread Omair Majid
* KUBOTA Yuji [2014-07-10 05:34]: > Thank you for response and CC to proper ml :) > I hope to backport this patch if there is no specific reason to block. Bug and patch look straight-forward and correct. No objections from me. Cheers, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprin

Re: Request for approval: 8040076. Memory leak: java.awt.List objects allowing multiple selections are not GC-ed

2014-07-16 Thread Omair Majid
* artem malinko [2014-07-08 03:54]: > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk6. > > Description: > Because of native peer List instances couldn't be garbage collected. > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040076 I can't access this bug :( > Fix included in jdk9: > http://hg.ope