Please, review the fix for
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK 6u45
compiles fine
This is a regression of the fix for OPENJDK6-35 (which is a backport of
JDK-6650759 to OpenJDK 6). In OpenJDK 7 this regression existed too -
it was tracked as
JDK-6938454: Unab
On 12/10/2014 12:06 PM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
> Please, review the fix for
> OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK 6u45
> compiles fine
>
> This is a regression of the fix for OPENJDK6-35 (which is a backport of
> JDK-6650759 to OpenJDK 6). In OpenJDK 7 this re
- Original Message -
> Please, review the fix for
> OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK 6u45
> compiles fine
>
> This is a regression of the fix for OPENJDK6-35 (which is a backport of
> JDK-6650759 to OpenJDK 6). In OpenJDK 7 this regression existed too
Hi Andrew,
I see your point that we chose a risky way and remember discussions
around
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-December/002195.html
that we had in the past when the fix for OPENJDK6-35 was in review.
Well, my opinion is that this risk was taken when we decided to inte
Hi Andrew,
OK, I see, thank you for this point!
Indeed, the fix is just a backport of JDK-6938454 to OpenJDK 6.
Thanks,
Nikolay
On 10.12.2014 19:11, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Please, review the fix for
OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle
On 12/10/2014 04:32 PM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
> I see your point that we chose a risky way and remember discussions
> around
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-December/002195.html
> that we had in the past when the fix for OPENJDK6-35 was in review.
>
> Well, my opinion is t
