Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-26 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 7/26/11 5:44 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > The issue here is I assumed these were one and the same thing Side note: I find the JCP glossary to be helpful in such cases: http://jcp.org/en/introduction/glossary cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-26 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 21:11 Mon 25 Jul , mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > 2011/7/25 17:00 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com: > > On 15:07 Wed 20 Jul 2011, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > >> Shipping the RI is part of finishing the JCP Final Release, > >> which is a different thing from shipping a supported product. >

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-25 Thread mark . reinhold
2011/7/25 17:00 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com: > On 15:07 Wed 20 Jul 2011, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: >> Shipping the RI is part of finishing the JCP Final Release, >> which is a different thing from shipping a supported product. >> >> 2011/7/20 14:07 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com: >>> But aren't the

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-25 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 15:07 Wed 20 Jul , mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > 2011/7/20 14:07 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com: > > On 08:41 Wed 20 Jul, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > >> The RI binaries are now available: http://jdk7.java.net/java-se-7-ri > > > > I thought the release wasn't until the 28th? Congrats.

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-25 Thread Paul Rank
Hi Mark, We are working to make JCK 7 available under the OCTLA. We hope to have JCK 7 available for you soon. Thanks, Paul On 7/25/2011 8:41 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 08:54 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: A JSR in the JCP must provide a Specification, a Conforma

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 08:54 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > A JSR in the JCP must provide a Specification, a Conformance Test Suite > (CTS), and one or more Reference Implementations (RIs). The RIs serve > to demonstrate that the Specification is implementable, and so of course > they mus

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-21 Thread Henri Gomez
>> What does it means exactly (I may misunderstood since english is not >> my primary language). > > A JSR in the JCP must provide a Specification, a Conformance Test Suite > (CTS), and one or more Reference Implementations (RIs).  The RIs serve > to demonstrate that the Specification is implementa

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-21 Thread mark . reinhold
> It won't be an official JCP-sanctioned Reference Implementation of Java SE 7 ? > > What does it means exactly (I may misunderstood since english is not > my primary language). A JSR in the JCP must provide a Specification, a Conformance Test Suite (CTS), and one or more Reference Implementation

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-21 Thread mark . reinhold
2011/7/20 23:40 -0700, henri.go...@gmail.com: > Question about OS/X. > > Is there any date about a RI for it ? Short answer: No, not yet. Longer answer: We don't yet have a date for when a supported version of JDK 7 on Mac OS/X will be available. When it is available it won't be an official JCP

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-21 Thread Henri Gomez
> Longer answer: We don't yet have a date for when a supported version of > JDK 7 on Mac OS/X will be available.  When it is available it won't be an > official JCP-sanctioned Reference Implementation of Java SE 7, but then > neither will any other product that implements the SE 7 specification, >

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:07 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > 2011/7/20 14:07 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com: > > On 08:41 Wed 20 Jul, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > >> The RI binaries are now available: http://jdk7.java.net/java-se-7-ri > > > > I thought the release wasn't until the 28th? C

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-20 Thread Henri Gomez
> Shipping the RI is part of finishing the JCP Final Release, > which is a different thing from shipping a supported product. Question about OS/X. Is there any date about a RI for it ? BTW, up to date packages are still available from http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/ of course :)

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-20 Thread mark . reinhold
2011/7/20 14:07 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com: > On 08:41 Wed 20 Jul, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: >> The RI binaries are now available: http://jdk7.java.net/java-se-7-ri > > I thought the release wasn't until the 28th? Congrats. on getting it done > early! Shipping the RI is part of finishing t

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-20 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 08:41 Wed 20 Jul , mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > 2011/6/9 7:33 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com: > > FYI, Oracle will be providing Reference Implementations for Java SE 7 > > (JSR 336) under both the GPL (with the Classpath Exception) as well as > > the traditional commercial BCL (Binary

Re: Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-07-20 Thread mark . reinhold
2011/6/9 7:33 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com: > FYI, Oracle will be providing Reference Implementations for Java SE 7 > (JSR 336) under both the GPL (with the Classpath Exception) as well as > the traditional commercial BCL (Binary Code License). The RI binaries are now available: http://jdk7.jav

Change in Java SE 7 Reference Implementation license

2011-06-09 Thread mark . reinhold
FYI, Oracle will be providing Reference Implementations for Java SE 7 (JSR 336) under both the GPL (with the Classpath Exception) as well as the traditional commercial BCL (Binary Code License). Details: http://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/moving_to_openjdk_as_the - Mark